In INS v. Elias-Zacarias, the Supreme Court examined the definition of refugee under the Refugee Act of 1980 and found that harm from refusing to join a guerrilla organization is not persecution on account of political opinion as defined under that Act. This decision is incompatible with the intent of the Refugee Act of 1980 and creates onerous burdens of proof for aliens seeking asylum. This Note analyzes the Court\u27s reasoning and concludes that Congress should enact legislation nullifying the Court\u27s decision
The immigration laws of the United States have long recognized a policy against deporting a person w...
This Article discusses certain instances in which claims for refugee protection could be recognized,...
Moderating a session at the Workshop on the Supreme Court and Immigration and Refugee Law at the Geo...
This Comment argues that the standards enunciated by the Supreme Court in Elias-Zacarias should not ...
During the height of the Central American civil wars of the 1980s, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal...
To receive asylum in the United States, persons must show that they are refugees. They do so by de...
With the passage of the Refugee Act of 1980, the United States took an important step toward fulfill...
This Comment analyzes the different interpretations of the well-founded fear of persecution standa...
This Article examines the evolution of the nexus requirement in United States refugee law since the ...
This article will discuss in greater detail the profound defects of the Court\u27s Zacarias decision...
This Article examines the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal\u27s decisions concerning the Refugee Act of...
In order to be granted asylum in the United States, an applicant has to show that she has suffered p...
International law requires that a person have a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of...
Refugee status at international law requires more than demonstration of a risk of being persecuted. ...
To obtain political asylum in the United States, an alien must demonstrate a well-founded fear of pe...
The immigration laws of the United States have long recognized a policy against deporting a person w...
This Article discusses certain instances in which claims for refugee protection could be recognized,...
Moderating a session at the Workshop on the Supreme Court and Immigration and Refugee Law at the Geo...
This Comment argues that the standards enunciated by the Supreme Court in Elias-Zacarias should not ...
During the height of the Central American civil wars of the 1980s, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal...
To receive asylum in the United States, persons must show that they are refugees. They do so by de...
With the passage of the Refugee Act of 1980, the United States took an important step toward fulfill...
This Comment analyzes the different interpretations of the well-founded fear of persecution standa...
This Article examines the evolution of the nexus requirement in United States refugee law since the ...
This article will discuss in greater detail the profound defects of the Court\u27s Zacarias decision...
This Article examines the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal\u27s decisions concerning the Refugee Act of...
In order to be granted asylum in the United States, an applicant has to show that she has suffered p...
International law requires that a person have a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of...
Refugee status at international law requires more than demonstration of a risk of being persecuted. ...
To obtain political asylum in the United States, an alien must demonstrate a well-founded fear of pe...
The immigration laws of the United States have long recognized a policy against deporting a person w...
This Article discusses certain instances in which claims for refugee protection could be recognized,...
Moderating a session at the Workshop on the Supreme Court and Immigration and Refugee Law at the Geo...