This Comment first examines the historical origins of section 6.32.250 of the Washington Revised Code, the Washington statute which greatly restricts the involuntary alienation of a beneficial trust interest. It then documents the problems that this statute has created for Washington courts. Finally, it concludes that section 6.32.250 has created needless confusion and recommends that the Washington legislature either repeal or revise the statute
The basic objectives of Washington real property law and of the Deed of Trust Act can be achieved on...
This comment suggests the proper construction of Washington’s unlawful transactions provision of the...
This Comment seeks to discuss the impact of the revisions made to North Carolina trust law effective...
In Part I, I shall explore restraints against voluntary alienation: that is, restrictions on a benef...
Discretionary and supplemental trusts are often created in settlement of personal injury lawsuits to...
The beneficiary of a spendthrift trust, created in 1921, sought to renounce and terminate her life i...
This Comment argues that similar legislation would be desirable in Washington. Even though the propo...
The authors examine in detail the validity of the private sale provisions of the Washington Deed of ...
Generally, federal gift tax consequences are uppermost in the Washington lawyer\u27s mind when he de...
This Comment argues that the donative intent analysis shields government proprietary transactions fr...
By enacting the Deed of Trust Act, the author suggests Washington has taken one step away from its a...
The English statute of frauds is the law in Washington so far as it is not inconsistent with the Co...
In 1875, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Miller delivered the opinion of the court in a case pertaining...
The purpose of this comment is to analyze the law on state regulation of federal financial instituti...
During the 1998 session, the Washington legislature added a provision to Title 11 of the Revised Cod...
The basic objectives of Washington real property law and of the Deed of Trust Act can be achieved on...
This comment suggests the proper construction of Washington’s unlawful transactions provision of the...
This Comment seeks to discuss the impact of the revisions made to North Carolina trust law effective...
In Part I, I shall explore restraints against voluntary alienation: that is, restrictions on a benef...
Discretionary and supplemental trusts are often created in settlement of personal injury lawsuits to...
The beneficiary of a spendthrift trust, created in 1921, sought to renounce and terminate her life i...
This Comment argues that similar legislation would be desirable in Washington. Even though the propo...
The authors examine in detail the validity of the private sale provisions of the Washington Deed of ...
Generally, federal gift tax consequences are uppermost in the Washington lawyer\u27s mind when he de...
This Comment argues that the donative intent analysis shields government proprietary transactions fr...
By enacting the Deed of Trust Act, the author suggests Washington has taken one step away from its a...
The English statute of frauds is the law in Washington so far as it is not inconsistent with the Co...
In 1875, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Miller delivered the opinion of the court in a case pertaining...
The purpose of this comment is to analyze the law on state regulation of federal financial instituti...
During the 1998 session, the Washington legislature added a provision to Title 11 of the Revised Cod...
The basic objectives of Washington real property law and of the Deed of Trust Act can be achieved on...
This comment suggests the proper construction of Washington’s unlawful transactions provision of the...
This Comment seeks to discuss the impact of the revisions made to North Carolina trust law effective...