Add to ORKGThis article discusses the underlying reasons for establishing rules of evidence, defines two unavoidable conflicts encountered in attempting to effectuate the purposes for adopting such rules, suggests that the Federal Rules of Evidence help resolve these conflicts by adhering to several clearly enunciated rationales, and, finally, indicates how the Rules recognize and accommodate important new scientific and social insights on the admissibility of evidence
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
Let\u27s start with how federal sausage is made. Recently, I read that the chief policymaking body s...
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
On July 1, 1975, the Federal Rules of Evidence went into effect. President Ford\u27s signature on Pu...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
The Federal Rules of Evidence have been in effect since 1975. Six years of experience is not much ti...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
The object of this article is to identify what makes evidence unfairly prejudicial. The first part a...
The Washington Committee on Judicial Administration assigned a section of its membership to study th...
IN DRAFTING the new rules for civil procedure in the federal courtsthe Supreme Court\u27s committee ...
One point that I shall endeavor to make today is that the Federal Rules of Evidence offer an opportu...
In 1995, Congress added three rules, which governed the admissibility of prior sexual misconduct i...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
Let\u27s start with how federal sausage is made. Recently, I read that the chief policymaking body s...
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
On July 1, 1975, the Federal Rules of Evidence went into effect. President Ford\u27s signature on Pu...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
The Federal Rules of Evidence have been in effect since 1975. Six years of experience is not much ti...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
The object of this article is to identify what makes evidence unfairly prejudicial. The first part a...
The Washington Committee on Judicial Administration assigned a section of its membership to study th...
IN DRAFTING the new rules for civil procedure in the federal courtsthe Supreme Court\u27s committee ...
One point that I shall endeavor to make today is that the Federal Rules of Evidence offer an opportu...
In 1995, Congress added three rules, which governed the admissibility of prior sexual misconduct i...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
Let\u27s start with how federal sausage is made. Recently, I read that the chief policymaking body s...
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...