D was convicted of second degree burglary. During the cross examination of three character witnesses for the defense, the prosecuting attorney asked, over the objections of the defense, the following questions: Did you know that in 1941 D had is operator\u27s license suspended? , Did you know that D spent twelve days in jail and was fined twenty-five dollars for drunkenness on January 10, 1949? and Did you know D was given twenty days for vagrancy in the city jail of Walla Walla? Held: The form of the questions was proper as long as it was not for the purpose of discerditing the person on trial. State v. Cyr, 40 Wn. 2d 840, 246 P2d 480 (1952)
D was convicted of second degree assault. The prosecuting attorney, ostensibly for the purpose of la...
Defendant, on trial for arson, presented a character witness who testified that defendant\u27s reput...
Witness testified before a federal grand jury regarding his participation in acts regarded by the gr...
On trial in a district court for bribing a federal revenue agent, defendant called five witnesses to...
Defendants were convicted of attempted burglary in the third degree and possession of burglar\u27s i...
ln an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in 1945, at which time he was a prisoner of ...
To attack the credibility of defendant charged with larceny of an automobile, the prosecution cross-...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
Witness testified before a federal grand jury regarding his participation in acts regarded by the gr...
D was indicted for second-degree burglary. During the course of the trial one of the jurors became i...
D was indicted for second-degree burglary. During the course of the trial one of the jurors became i...
At common law persons convicted of heinous offenses were not competent as witnesses. In order to be ...
At common law persons convicted of heinous offenses were not competent as witnesses. In order to be ...
D was convicted of second degree assault. The prosecuting attorney, ostensibly for the purpose of la...
Defendant, on trial for arson, presented a character witness who testified that defendant\u27s reput...
Witness testified before a federal grand jury regarding his participation in acts regarded by the gr...
On trial in a district court for bribing a federal revenue agent, defendant called five witnesses to...
Defendants were convicted of attempted burglary in the third degree and possession of burglar\u27s i...
ln an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in 1945, at which time he was a prisoner of ...
To attack the credibility of defendant charged with larceny of an automobile, the prosecution cross-...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
Witness testified before a federal grand jury regarding his participation in acts regarded by the gr...
D was indicted for second-degree burglary. During the course of the trial one of the jurors became i...
D was indicted for second-degree burglary. During the course of the trial one of the jurors became i...
At common law persons convicted of heinous offenses were not competent as witnesses. In order to be ...
At common law persons convicted of heinous offenses were not competent as witnesses. In order to be ...
D was convicted of second degree assault. The prosecuting attorney, ostensibly for the purpose of la...
Defendant, on trial for arson, presented a character witness who testified that defendant\u27s reput...
Witness testified before a federal grand jury regarding his participation in acts regarded by the gr...