In Cline v. Price the owners of a minority interest in a fishing vessel, being dissatisfied with the use to which it was being put, brought suit in Superior Court against the majority owners. The action prayed the appointment of a receiver, an accounting, and a partition of the vessel by sale and distribution of the proceeds. A demurrer was sustained by the lower court and affirmed by the Supreme Court. The ground assigned was that the suit, essentially one for partition, was exclusively within the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States, and the state courts have no jurisdiction to afford such relief. This pitfall of exclusive admiralty jurisdiction is one which the practitioner in our maritime state of Washington may often have occasi...
The traditional American locality test\u27 for admiralty tort (subject-matter) jurisdiction, which...
The constitutionality of the admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Canada has been in dispu...
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, a...
The case of Ex parte Boyer1 closes with the statement that it does not raise the question whether t...
The United States Constitution provides that [t]he judicial power shall extend . . . to all cases o...
From the nation\u27s beginning, the federal district courts have been vested with jurisdiction in ca...
Libelant linehandler, injured undocking a vessel, brought a personal injury action against the shipo...
In light of the rationale behind the establishment of the admiralty jurisdiction, it seems to me con...
In light of the rationale behind the establishment of the admiralty jurisdiction, it seems to me con...
Under the United States Constitution, federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involvin...
ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION EXISTS IN CASES STEMMING FROM BOAT COLLISIONS ON NAVIGABLE WATERS REGARDLESS ...
The many advantages the admiralty gives to an injured plaintiff, particularly if he can be brought w...
The Supreme Court of the United States, by that five to four division, unfortunately so usual in the...
This article will examine the two decisional approaches that the Richardson Court considered in supp...
Petitioners paid money to respondent for prospective passage to Europe on his passenger vessel held ...
The traditional American locality test\u27 for admiralty tort (subject-matter) jurisdiction, which...
The constitutionality of the admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Canada has been in dispu...
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, a...
The case of Ex parte Boyer1 closes with the statement that it does not raise the question whether t...
The United States Constitution provides that [t]he judicial power shall extend . . . to all cases o...
From the nation\u27s beginning, the federal district courts have been vested with jurisdiction in ca...
Libelant linehandler, injured undocking a vessel, brought a personal injury action against the shipo...
In light of the rationale behind the establishment of the admiralty jurisdiction, it seems to me con...
In light of the rationale behind the establishment of the admiralty jurisdiction, it seems to me con...
Under the United States Constitution, federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involvin...
ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION EXISTS IN CASES STEMMING FROM BOAT COLLISIONS ON NAVIGABLE WATERS REGARDLESS ...
The many advantages the admiralty gives to an injured plaintiff, particularly if he can be brought w...
The Supreme Court of the United States, by that five to four division, unfortunately so usual in the...
This article will examine the two decisional approaches that the Richardson Court considered in supp...
Petitioners paid money to respondent for prospective passage to Europe on his passenger vessel held ...
The traditional American locality test\u27 for admiralty tort (subject-matter) jurisdiction, which...
The constitutionality of the admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Canada has been in dispu...
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, a...