With a reversal of position amounting almost to defiance of precedent, the majority opinion in Powell v. Superior Portland Cement, Inc. denies damages for injury caused to respondent\u27s premises by dust from appellant\u27s plant at Concrete, Washington. The plant, in operation since 1908, is the main industry of the town, at least half of its residents being economically dependent upon the plant. Respondent, who had resided in Concrete since 1907, in 1934 purchased a home within three blocks of the cement plant, and lived therein until August 1938, when he left Concrete. The home, partially furnished, has been rented since 1938
Defendant-tenant notified plaintiff-landlord that he intended to vacate the space leased for his dru...
Landowners were entitled to future damages in a permanent trespass action against a neighboring cott...
Covers cases on the disposition of property in divorce and on the power and jurisdiction of juvenile...
Covers cases on damages for private nuisances and on interest on disputed claims
Covers cases on easements by implied reservations, on condemnation of public property, on proof of i...
Award for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to awa...
Adjoining Landowners-Lateral Support.-Defendant was sued for injuries to plaintiff\u27s dwelling on ...
In the 1959 Oregon decision of Martin v. Reynolds Metals Co., the supreme court of that state re-inv...
Landlord and Tenant—Duty to Repair; Municipal Corporations—Powers—Sale of Excess Electrical Energy; ...
Grant of nonsuit was affirmed because welder failed to demonstrate that company that sold him cement...
The most significant case during the Survey period is Gulf Oil Corp.v. Forcum. The State of Tennesse...
Plaintiff sought to recover for injuries suffered in consequence of the defective condition of a sta...
The Wandermere Corporation owned one mile of frontage along an open-access highway. The state planne...
Plaintiff sought recovery for value of improvements claimed to have been made as an occupying claim...
Plaintiff and defendant were ad joining landowners. Roots of poplar trees on defendant\u27s land ext...
Defendant-tenant notified plaintiff-landlord that he intended to vacate the space leased for his dru...
Landowners were entitled to future damages in a permanent trespass action against a neighboring cott...
Covers cases on the disposition of property in divorce and on the power and jurisdiction of juvenile...
Covers cases on damages for private nuisances and on interest on disputed claims
Covers cases on easements by implied reservations, on condemnation of public property, on proof of i...
Award for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to awa...
Adjoining Landowners-Lateral Support.-Defendant was sued for injuries to plaintiff\u27s dwelling on ...
In the 1959 Oregon decision of Martin v. Reynolds Metals Co., the supreme court of that state re-inv...
Landlord and Tenant—Duty to Repair; Municipal Corporations—Powers—Sale of Excess Electrical Energy; ...
Grant of nonsuit was affirmed because welder failed to demonstrate that company that sold him cement...
The most significant case during the Survey period is Gulf Oil Corp.v. Forcum. The State of Tennesse...
Plaintiff sought to recover for injuries suffered in consequence of the defective condition of a sta...
The Wandermere Corporation owned one mile of frontage along an open-access highway. The state planne...
Plaintiff sought recovery for value of improvements claimed to have been made as an occupying claim...
Plaintiff and defendant were ad joining landowners. Roots of poplar trees on defendant\u27s land ext...
Defendant-tenant notified plaintiff-landlord that he intended to vacate the space leased for his dru...
Landowners were entitled to future damages in a permanent trespass action against a neighboring cott...
Covers cases on the disposition of property in divorce and on the power and jurisdiction of juvenile...