Add to ORKGThis note analyzes the Home court\u27s reasoning in expanding the standard of care in legal malpractice actions to include a duty to refer and in holding attorneys to the same standard of care as physicians. This note also evaluates the considerations relevant to distinguishing specialist cases from generalist cases and the need for expert testimony in determining liability for failure to refer
In this article, the author proposes that the traditional custom-based standard applicable in medica...
No law exists which precisely determines the liability of a medical practitioner in respect of his p...
This article begins by defining the problem of conflation of the duty of care and the duty of loyalt...
In Bowman v. John Doe Two, the Washington Supreme Court considered whether an attorney owes a duty o...
This Article will review existing case law and commentary, and propose a new formula for application...
In Hizey v. Carpenter, the Washington Supreme Court became the only court of last resort to prohibit...
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has held that the common law distinction between a licen...
Covers cases on contributory negligence as not a defense to wanton misconduct, on res ipsa loquitur ...
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In the 1992 decision of Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior Court the Califor...
This Note will examine the court\u27s rationale in Hannola v City of Lakewood and the previous leadi...
An attorney is not an insurer of the result of a case in which he is employed, without a special con...
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In this Article, Professor Silver examines the origins of present-day malpractice law. He begins by ...
Until recently, when we spoke of malpractice we invariably meant medical malpractice. Less than 20 y...
In this article, the author proposes that the traditional custom-based standard applicable in medica...
No law exists which precisely determines the liability of a medical practitioner in respect of his p...
This article begins by defining the problem of conflation of the duty of care and the duty of loyalt...
In Bowman v. John Doe Two, the Washington Supreme Court considered whether an attorney owes a duty o...
This Article will review existing case law and commentary, and propose a new formula for application...
In Hizey v. Carpenter, the Washington Supreme Court became the only court of last resort to prohibit...
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has held that the common law distinction between a licen...
Covers cases on contributory negligence as not a defense to wanton misconduct, on res ipsa loquitur ...
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In the 1992 decision of Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior Court the Califor...
This Note will examine the court\u27s rationale in Hannola v City of Lakewood and the previous leadi...
An attorney is not an insurer of the result of a case in which he is employed, without a special con...
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In this Article, Professor Silver examines the origins of present-day malpractice law. He begins by ...
Until recently, when we spoke of malpractice we invariably meant medical malpractice. Less than 20 y...
In this article, the author proposes that the traditional custom-based standard applicable in medica...
No law exists which precisely determines the liability of a medical practitioner in respect of his p...
This article begins by defining the problem of conflation of the duty of care and the duty of loyalt...