This article presents an analysis of those provisions of the MMPA which may impede the achievement of FCMA objectives. It is important that these possible conflicts be resolved because while the United States controls off the coast of Alaska what may be the world\u27s largest resources of fish, these same waters contain enormous numbers of marine mammals. These fishery resources, if managed rationally, can make a large contribution to the economy of the United States and to the protein needs of the world. A reasonable accommodation between the MMPA and the FCMA must be found in order to achieve that possibility
In 1994, Congress reauthorized the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). As part of the reauthorizati...
This note focuses on one such instance where a court erred in interpreting a key term in the MMPA. I...
In one of its last acts of 2006, the 109th Congress passed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation...
The purpose of this article is to discuss three things: First, the background which led to the passa...
Over its twenty-four year history, the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA) has had both its ...
In 1994, Congress reauthorized the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). As part of the reauthorizati...
This discusses a range of issues likely to be raised during any reauthorization debate, the reasons ...
In 1972, Congress enacted the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMA), establishing a national program to...
This Article examines the potential role that the Third United Nations Law of the Sea Conference has...
The enactment of the Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, which extends United States ju...
The purposes of this article are to analyze the enforcement provisions of the FCMA, to compare them ...
Many fish stocks targeted by fishermen are also a primary food source of marine mammals. Normally t...
This Note examines how the United States has used the Marine Mammal Protection Act to further intern...
On October 21, 1972, when President Nixon signed the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA, or the Act)...
The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) requires that every U.S. commercial fishery be placed in one...
In 1994, Congress reauthorized the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). As part of the reauthorizati...
This note focuses on one such instance where a court erred in interpreting a key term in the MMPA. I...
In one of its last acts of 2006, the 109th Congress passed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation...
The purpose of this article is to discuss three things: First, the background which led to the passa...
Over its twenty-four year history, the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA) has had both its ...
In 1994, Congress reauthorized the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). As part of the reauthorizati...
This discusses a range of issues likely to be raised during any reauthorization debate, the reasons ...
In 1972, Congress enacted the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMA), establishing a national program to...
This Article examines the potential role that the Third United Nations Law of the Sea Conference has...
The enactment of the Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, which extends United States ju...
The purposes of this article are to analyze the enforcement provisions of the FCMA, to compare them ...
Many fish stocks targeted by fishermen are also a primary food source of marine mammals. Normally t...
This Note examines how the United States has used the Marine Mammal Protection Act to further intern...
On October 21, 1972, when President Nixon signed the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA, or the Act)...
The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) requires that every U.S. commercial fishery be placed in one...
In 1994, Congress reauthorized the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). As part of the reauthorizati...
This note focuses on one such instance where a court erred in interpreting a key term in the MMPA. I...
In one of its last acts of 2006, the 109th Congress passed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation...