Add to ORKGThis note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Washington, placing special emphasis on the doctrine\u27s underlying policies and their applicability in automobile negligence cases. This note then discusses the problems which may arise from the Merrick court\u27s failure to abolish the parental immunity entirely. Looking to the future, this note suggests that the immunity be abolished in favor of a standard of care recognizing the legal duty of a parent to act as a reasonably prudent parent
Both pairs of parents sued on their own behalfs for (1) the expenses incurred in the care and treatm...
Two recent cases, one from New York and one from Illinois, have again focused attention on injuries ...
In the last decade approaching the 1970s, Texas has adopted a less rigid approach to the parent-chil...
This note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Wash...
If the overriding purpose of tort law is to compensate those injured by the wrongdoing of another, t...
New Hampshire has now joined the trend toward the abolition of the parental immunity doctrine. Dean ...
An action between a parent and his minor child was not prohibited at common law. In fact, the child ...
However repugnant it may seem that a minor child should sue his own father, it is equally repugnant ...
Although there is no case authority, it is probable that at common law there was no prohibition agai...
Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St. 3d 326, 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984); Shearer v. Shearer, 18 Ohio St. 3d 9...
This Note has four objectives. First, this Note will summarize the facts of Coffey. Second, this Not...
Parental immunity prohibits a child from instituting a suit against his parent for a personal tort. ...
Discussions of parental liability by courts and legal scholars are often tinged with fear: fear that...
In light of the abrupt change in Ohio concerning the parental immunity doctrine, this comment will e...
Child neglect and abandonment are serious problems in the United States. The number of children in f...
Both pairs of parents sued on their own behalfs for (1) the expenses incurred in the care and treatm...
Two recent cases, one from New York and one from Illinois, have again focused attention on injuries ...
In the last decade approaching the 1970s, Texas has adopted a less rigid approach to the parent-chil...
This note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Wash...
If the overriding purpose of tort law is to compensate those injured by the wrongdoing of another, t...
New Hampshire has now joined the trend toward the abolition of the parental immunity doctrine. Dean ...
An action between a parent and his minor child was not prohibited at common law. In fact, the child ...
However repugnant it may seem that a minor child should sue his own father, it is equally repugnant ...
Although there is no case authority, it is probable that at common law there was no prohibition agai...
Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St. 3d 326, 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984); Shearer v. Shearer, 18 Ohio St. 3d 9...
This Note has four objectives. First, this Note will summarize the facts of Coffey. Second, this Not...
Parental immunity prohibits a child from instituting a suit against his parent for a personal tort. ...
Discussions of parental liability by courts and legal scholars are often tinged with fear: fear that...
In light of the abrupt change in Ohio concerning the parental immunity doctrine, this comment will e...
Child neglect and abandonment are serious problems in the United States. The number of children in f...
Both pairs of parents sued on their own behalfs for (1) the expenses incurred in the care and treatm...
Two recent cases, one from New York and one from Illinois, have again focused attention on injuries ...
In the last decade approaching the 1970s, Texas has adopted a less rigid approach to the parent-chil...