With the enactment of R.C.W. § 4.24.350,however, the Washington State Legislature has made the malicious plaintiff an endangered species in this state. The statute eliminates two major common law roadblocks—one procedural, the other substantive—to successful assertion of an action for malicious prosecution of an ordinary civil suit. Unfortunately, because the new law is so intimidatingly expansive in its apparent scope, potential plaintiffs with arguably valid claims may also be deterred from seeking legal redress
Not long ago, American tort law clearly rejected an "outlaw" doctrine: a plaintiff engaged in tortio...
In Washington State, tortfeasors get a break when they commit intentional torts. Instead of receivin...
In State v. Schwab, the Washington Supreme Court removed residential landlord-tenant transactions fr...
The common-law tort of malicious prosecution originally developed to provide a remedy for plaintiffs...
Courts in most American jurisdictions have long imposed civil liability on plaintiffs who misuse cou...
Prior to the appearance of Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co., it appeared reasonably clear that in de...
Covers cases on limitation of actions in malpractice suits, on the extent of liability for ultrahaza...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
In 1970, the Washington Legislature enacted a campus disorder statute which makes it unlawful for an...
The general rule is always stated to be that an injunction will not be granted to stay criminal or q...
Coves cases on appeal—preservation of grounds—misconduct of the prosecuting attorney
Covers cases on default judgment—failure of complaint to state facts sufficient to constitute cause ...
Plaintiffs sought damages from the State of Washington for property destroyed by a juvenile escapee ...
American courts traditionally exclude evidence that a defendant has committed crimes other than the ...
This note first examines the development of the standards currently applied in Washington for determ...
Not long ago, American tort law clearly rejected an "outlaw" doctrine: a plaintiff engaged in tortio...
In Washington State, tortfeasors get a break when they commit intentional torts. Instead of receivin...
In State v. Schwab, the Washington Supreme Court removed residential landlord-tenant transactions fr...
The common-law tort of malicious prosecution originally developed to provide a remedy for plaintiffs...
Courts in most American jurisdictions have long imposed civil liability on plaintiffs who misuse cou...
Prior to the appearance of Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co., it appeared reasonably clear that in de...
Covers cases on limitation of actions in malpractice suits, on the extent of liability for ultrahaza...
By an amended information, in a recent Washington case, respondent was charged with the crime of per...
In 1970, the Washington Legislature enacted a campus disorder statute which makes it unlawful for an...
The general rule is always stated to be that an injunction will not be granted to stay criminal or q...
Coves cases on appeal—preservation of grounds—misconduct of the prosecuting attorney
Covers cases on default judgment—failure of complaint to state facts sufficient to constitute cause ...
Plaintiffs sought damages from the State of Washington for property destroyed by a juvenile escapee ...
American courts traditionally exclude evidence that a defendant has committed crimes other than the ...
This note first examines the development of the standards currently applied in Washington for determ...
Not long ago, American tort law clearly rejected an "outlaw" doctrine: a plaintiff engaged in tortio...
In Washington State, tortfeasors get a break when they commit intentional torts. Instead of receivin...
In State v. Schwab, the Washington Supreme Court removed residential landlord-tenant transactions fr...