Add to ORKGSentencing constitutes the critical connection between the criminal law and the penal system. Therefore, any analysis of sentencing involves fundamental and perplexing questions about the purposes and problems of the criminal justice system. This comment will focus on one of those problems: the exercise of judicial discretion in sentencing
Sentencing philosophies and the power to determine a convict\u27s fate have been topics of much deba...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Since 1986, the country has been witness to a revolution in federal sentencing practice: indetermina...
The desirability and constitutionality of discretionary criminal sentencing can be ascertained only ...
Excerpts taken from Professor Israel\u27s revision of Hazel B. Kerper\u27s Introduction to the Crimi...
[The following excerpts are taken from Professor Jerold Israel\u27s revision of the late Hazel B. Ke...
This article explores the topic of sentencing guidelines. Specifically, the author weighs the intend...
This paper studies the institutional structure of criminal sentencing, focusing on the interaction b...
The Supreme Court has clearly stated the general rule that sentencing lies properly within the sound...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions in United States v. Booker and Blakely v. Washington, invali...
The imposition of sanctions on convicted offenders is a principal vehicle for accomplishing the goal...
The Columbia Law Review\u27s Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the...
Forst and Bushway (2010) argue that criminal justice policy choices and tools (laws, regulations and...
This article examines the topic of using offender characteristics in guideline sentencing—a controve...
Professor Palmer proposes a new model of criminal dispositions which would replace official discreti...
Sentencing philosophies and the power to determine a convict\u27s fate have been topics of much deba...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Since 1986, the country has been witness to a revolution in federal sentencing practice: indetermina...
The desirability and constitutionality of discretionary criminal sentencing can be ascertained only ...
Excerpts taken from Professor Israel\u27s revision of Hazel B. Kerper\u27s Introduction to the Crimi...
[The following excerpts are taken from Professor Jerold Israel\u27s revision of the late Hazel B. Ke...
This article explores the topic of sentencing guidelines. Specifically, the author weighs the intend...
This paper studies the institutional structure of criminal sentencing, focusing on the interaction b...
The Supreme Court has clearly stated the general rule that sentencing lies properly within the sound...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions in United States v. Booker and Blakely v. Washington, invali...
The imposition of sanctions on convicted offenders is a principal vehicle for accomplishing the goal...
The Columbia Law Review\u27s Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the...
Forst and Bushway (2010) argue that criminal justice policy choices and tools (laws, regulations and...
This article examines the topic of using offender characteristics in guideline sentencing—a controve...
Professor Palmer proposes a new model of criminal dispositions which would replace official discreti...
Sentencing philosophies and the power to determine a convict\u27s fate have been topics of much deba...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Since 1986, the country has been witness to a revolution in federal sentencing practice: indetermina...