Add to ORKGBasically, I am dissatisfied with the Proposed Code for three reasons: (1) the Code is incomplete; (2) the Code has in many cases imposed an unrealistic burden of proof on the state which will be impractical or impossible to sustain; and (3) the Code has too narrowly defined and too leniently graded many offenses
T HE subject of this symposium, the proposed Michigan Revised Criminal Code (Proposed Code),\u27 is ...
The thesis of this talk can be simply stated: In any serious discussion of revising the Model Penal ...
As of 1975, Alaska’s criminal laws were based primarily on Oregon criminal statutes as they existed ...
Those who work with Washington\u27s criminal law generally concede that it is in need of substantial...
The Proposed Code is comprehensive, and when one adds the criminal provisions in other chapters of t...
I have chosen to discuss three areas of the Proposed Code: the proof requirement (with primary empha...
In this article, the author seeks to review the Code with the advantage of hindsight afforded by the...
This comment is designed to acquaint the reader with the major sections of the Revised Washington Cr...
Any discussion of federal penal law must begin with an important caveat: There actually is no federa...
Each American jurisdiction has a criminal code. Most jurisdictions have substantially restructured a...
The four chief factors influencing the quality of American justice were identified by Dean Roscoe Po...
After planning the effort for twenty years, the American Law Institute spent ten years debating and ...
On December 6, 1972, a new Crimes Code, was approved, to be effective June 6, 1973. The new Crimes ...
The Standards governing Washington’s public defenders represent a significant reform aimed at protec...
This Article addresses the ongoing-and, indeed, accelerating process of sporadic, piecemeal, and unn...
T HE subject of this symposium, the proposed Michigan Revised Criminal Code (Proposed Code),\u27 is ...
The thesis of this talk can be simply stated: In any serious discussion of revising the Model Penal ...
As of 1975, Alaska’s criminal laws were based primarily on Oregon criminal statutes as they existed ...
Those who work with Washington\u27s criminal law generally concede that it is in need of substantial...
The Proposed Code is comprehensive, and when one adds the criminal provisions in other chapters of t...
I have chosen to discuss three areas of the Proposed Code: the proof requirement (with primary empha...
In this article, the author seeks to review the Code with the advantage of hindsight afforded by the...
This comment is designed to acquaint the reader with the major sections of the Revised Washington Cr...
Any discussion of federal penal law must begin with an important caveat: There actually is no federa...
Each American jurisdiction has a criminal code. Most jurisdictions have substantially restructured a...
The four chief factors influencing the quality of American justice were identified by Dean Roscoe Po...
After planning the effort for twenty years, the American Law Institute spent ten years debating and ...
On December 6, 1972, a new Crimes Code, was approved, to be effective June 6, 1973. The new Crimes ...
The Standards governing Washington’s public defenders represent a significant reform aimed at protec...
This Article addresses the ongoing-and, indeed, accelerating process of sporadic, piecemeal, and unn...
T HE subject of this symposium, the proposed Michigan Revised Criminal Code (Proposed Code),\u27 is ...
The thesis of this talk can be simply stated: In any serious discussion of revising the Model Penal ...
As of 1975, Alaska’s criminal laws were based primarily on Oregon criminal statutes as they existed ...