In an article written three years ago, this author introduced the subject with the observation that, of the several grounds for a new trial in Washington, one in particular had created considerable difficulty for the supreme court, trial judges, and counsel. This was the rule permitting a new trial when substantial justice has not been done, and followed by the provision that, In all cases wherein the trial court grants a motion for a new trial, it shall, in the order granting the motion, give definite reasons of law and facts for so doing
In this Article, Professor Lee examines the government motion requirement for substantial assistance...
Covers cases on the right to counsel—waiver—indigent prisoners and on aiding and abetting distinguis...
In this Article, I review the efficacy of peremptory challenges and conclude that both empirical and...
In an article written three years ago, this author introduced the subject with the observation that,...
Of the several grounds for a new trial in Washington, one in particular has created considerable dif...
A perennial problem confronting the attorney preparing for trial is whether his client has a right t...
P sued D for malpractice. After a verdict for P, the trial court granted D\u27s motion for new trial...
The granting or denying of a continuance is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court,...
This article reviews the Blakely decision and the Washington Legislature\u27s response in S.B. 5477....
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
This note first examines the development of the standards currently applied in Washington for determ...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
It would seem a truism to state that the object of courts of justice is to do justice between the pa...
Justice does not always mean that a case should be tried. By the same token, justice does not always...
the first section of this essay is devoted to demonstrating the courts\u27 errors. Nonetheless, cons...
In this Article, Professor Lee examines the government motion requirement for substantial assistance...
Covers cases on the right to counsel—waiver—indigent prisoners and on aiding and abetting distinguis...
In this Article, I review the efficacy of peremptory challenges and conclude that both empirical and...
In an article written three years ago, this author introduced the subject with the observation that,...
Of the several grounds for a new trial in Washington, one in particular has created considerable dif...
A perennial problem confronting the attorney preparing for trial is whether his client has a right t...
P sued D for malpractice. After a verdict for P, the trial court granted D\u27s motion for new trial...
The granting or denying of a continuance is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court,...
This article reviews the Blakely decision and the Washington Legislature\u27s response in S.B. 5477....
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
This note first examines the development of the standards currently applied in Washington for determ...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
It would seem a truism to state that the object of courts of justice is to do justice between the pa...
Justice does not always mean that a case should be tried. By the same token, justice does not always...
the first section of this essay is devoted to demonstrating the courts\u27 errors. Nonetheless, cons...
In this Article, Professor Lee examines the government motion requirement for substantial assistance...
Covers cases on the right to counsel—waiver—indigent prisoners and on aiding and abetting distinguis...
In this Article, I review the efficacy of peremptory challenges and conclude that both empirical and...