In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between clinical variables is inordinately influenced by cases seen earlier rather than later in a presentation sequence. In this study, medical and nursing trainees evidenced this behavior in a hypothetical clinical judgment situation. The behavior was tied to an attention decrement explanation, by which inattention to the later-presented cases leads to inaccurate recall of the relative frequencies of observed cases, which in turn induces a misjudgment of a disease-finding contingency. An explicit intervention based on this hypothesis, forcing attention to later cases by warning that recall of the case frequencies would be required, was effective in re...
Two types of model may account for how people learn and make judgments about contingent relationship...
Many theories of contingency learning assume (either explicitly or implicitly) that predicting wheth...
In three experiments, participants made causal judgements from summary presentations of information ...
In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between cli...
Subjects made judgments concerning the strength and direction of the contingency between two dichoto...
Traditional associative models assume that associative weights are updated on a trial-by-trial basis...
peer reviewedSocial cognition research has demonstrated that processes of memory and judgment format...
A contingency judgment entails an evaluation of the predictive relation between a cue and an outcome...
textabstractIn two experiments, the effects of level of medical expertise and study time on free rec...
Four experiments examined trial sequencing effects in human contingency judgment. In Experiments 1-3...
Contingency judgment is assumed to play a central role in prediction, control, and explanation. Here...
In four experiments participants made judgements about two possible causes of an effect. The prevale...
115 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1981.This study investigated the e...
It is proposed that causal judgments about contingency information are derived from the proportion o...
BACKGROUND This study was directed at illuminating a well known phenomenon in the medical expertise ...
Two types of model may account for how people learn and make judgments about contingent relationship...
Many theories of contingency learning assume (either explicitly or implicitly) that predicting wheth...
In three experiments, participants made causal judgements from summary presentations of information ...
In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between cli...
Subjects made judgments concerning the strength and direction of the contingency between two dichoto...
Traditional associative models assume that associative weights are updated on a trial-by-trial basis...
peer reviewedSocial cognition research has demonstrated that processes of memory and judgment format...
A contingency judgment entails an evaluation of the predictive relation between a cue and an outcome...
textabstractIn two experiments, the effects of level of medical expertise and study time on free rec...
Four experiments examined trial sequencing effects in human contingency judgment. In Experiments 1-3...
Contingency judgment is assumed to play a central role in prediction, control, and explanation. Here...
In four experiments participants made judgements about two possible causes of an effect. The prevale...
115 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1981.This study investigated the e...
It is proposed that causal judgments about contingency information are derived from the proportion o...
BACKGROUND This study was directed at illuminating a well known phenomenon in the medical expertise ...
Two types of model may account for how people learn and make judgments about contingent relationship...
Many theories of contingency learning assume (either explicitly or implicitly) that predicting wheth...
In three experiments, participants made causal judgements from summary presentations of information ...