Collateral estoppel is an aspect of the doctrine of res judicata that precludes relitigation of issues previously adjudicated. A judgment in a prior action may be held conclusive as to issues in a subsequent case. even though the later case technically involves a different cause of action. The rule of collateral estoppel seeks to conserve judicial energy, promote confidence in the judicial system, avoid litigant expense, promote community peace and reliance on judgments, and minimize inconsistent results. Countervailing policy concerns are the right of each person to have his day in court, the fear of increased litigation, the danger of perpetuating error, the need for flexibility, and other considerations of fairness. Whether a court will...
Perhaps no legal doctrine has been the source of so much confusion and misunderstanding as collatera...
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board\u27...
Plaintiff corporations, the sole shareholder of which was their president, sued defendant insurers t...
First, the Note briefly traces the demise of the mutuality rule in nontax cases. Second, the Note di...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Collateral estoppel has been defined as the facet of the doctrine of judicial finality that deals w...
In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, the United States Supreme Court ap- -proved the offensive, unilate...
The doctrine of collateral estoppel involves the use of an old judgment in a new action to prevent t...
A recent Note, A Probabilistic Analysis of the Doctrine of Mutuality of Collateral Estoppel, made...
This Note initially discusses the doctrine of collateral estoppel and its policy justifications. Nex...
When an individual opts out of a federal class action, that person is shielded from the impact of a ...
This article explores the area of "cross-over" collateral estoppel in civil/criminal actions. The ar...
To secure compliance with federal income tax laws, Congress has provided both criminal and civil pen...
Courts have long used the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude relitigation of previously det...
This Note adopts a more moderate position: the Bernhard doctrine is but a minor alteration of collat...
Perhaps no legal doctrine has been the source of so much confusion and misunderstanding as collatera...
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board\u27...
Plaintiff corporations, the sole shareholder of which was their president, sued defendant insurers t...
First, the Note briefly traces the demise of the mutuality rule in nontax cases. Second, the Note di...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Collateral estoppel has been defined as the facet of the doctrine of judicial finality that deals w...
In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, the United States Supreme Court ap- -proved the offensive, unilate...
The doctrine of collateral estoppel involves the use of an old judgment in a new action to prevent t...
A recent Note, A Probabilistic Analysis of the Doctrine of Mutuality of Collateral Estoppel, made...
This Note initially discusses the doctrine of collateral estoppel and its policy justifications. Nex...
When an individual opts out of a federal class action, that person is shielded from the impact of a ...
This article explores the area of "cross-over" collateral estoppel in civil/criminal actions. The ar...
To secure compliance with federal income tax laws, Congress has provided both criminal and civil pen...
Courts have long used the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude relitigation of previously det...
This Note adopts a more moderate position: the Bernhard doctrine is but a minor alteration of collat...
Perhaps no legal doctrine has been the source of so much confusion and misunderstanding as collatera...
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board\u27...
Plaintiff corporations, the sole shareholder of which was their president, sued defendant insurers t...