We examine the profitability of insider trading under SEC Rule 10b5-1 plans. The plans do work to prevent some informed trading. However, on average, insider trading under the safe harbor plans appears to be motivated by material non-public information. We propose some policy changes to tighten the rule and enable separation of informed and uninformed insider trading
In recent years much attention has been focused on the phenomenon of insider trading. The United S...
In Chiarella V. United States, the United States Supreme Court stated that the prohibition against t...
Recent SEC enforcement actions, such as the case filed against Dallas Mavericks\u27 owner Mark Cub...
Insider trading has shaped both the evolution of the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and the cu...
The current law on insider trading is arbitrary and unrationalized in its limited scope in a number ...
The adoption of Rule 10b5-1 was, in a manner of speaking, a deal with the devil that the SEC and som...
I devote most of this essay to exploring how, exactly, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”...
The Securities and Exchange Commission is poised to take action in the face of compelling evidence t...
The federal securities laws do not contain a definition of insider trading. As a result, case law ha...
Section 17(a)(3) has been widely neglected as a weapon in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (...
Insider trading has presented some of the most unsettled and contentious issues of corporate law. Th...
The history of insider trading law is a tale of administrative usurpation and legislative acquiescen...
Insider trading occurs when people trade stocks based on material nonpublic information—private know...
In this Article, Professor Wolfson advances the concept that insider trading law under Securities an...
William Cary’s opinion for the SEC in In re Cady, Roberts & Co. built the foundation on which the mo...
In recent years much attention has been focused on the phenomenon of insider trading. The United S...
In Chiarella V. United States, the United States Supreme Court stated that the prohibition against t...
Recent SEC enforcement actions, such as the case filed against Dallas Mavericks\u27 owner Mark Cub...
Insider trading has shaped both the evolution of the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and the cu...
The current law on insider trading is arbitrary and unrationalized in its limited scope in a number ...
The adoption of Rule 10b5-1 was, in a manner of speaking, a deal with the devil that the SEC and som...
I devote most of this essay to exploring how, exactly, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”...
The Securities and Exchange Commission is poised to take action in the face of compelling evidence t...
The federal securities laws do not contain a definition of insider trading. As a result, case law ha...
Section 17(a)(3) has been widely neglected as a weapon in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (...
Insider trading has presented some of the most unsettled and contentious issues of corporate law. Th...
The history of insider trading law is a tale of administrative usurpation and legislative acquiescen...
Insider trading occurs when people trade stocks based on material nonpublic information—private know...
In this Article, Professor Wolfson advances the concept that insider trading law under Securities an...
William Cary’s opinion for the SEC in In re Cady, Roberts & Co. built the foundation on which the mo...
In recent years much attention has been focused on the phenomenon of insider trading. The United S...
In Chiarella V. United States, the United States Supreme Court stated that the prohibition against t...
Recent SEC enforcement actions, such as the case filed against Dallas Mavericks\u27 owner Mark Cub...