A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of reimplanting, and of implanting technique, on the performance of yearling heifers. Daily gains of reimplanted, single implanted and non-implanted cattle averaged 3.00, 2.93 and 2.81 lb, respectively. Implanting Ralgro at the base of the ear produced a slight and not statically significant increase in again over the old site 1 to 2 in. from the base of the ear. Feed efficiency of the single implant heifers was 5.5% better than controls, with an additional 1.9% improvement due to reimplanting. Carcass characteristics were not materially influenced by implant treatment
Heifers that were flank-spayed plus rumen-ovarian autografted (FS+A) responded similarly to Ralgro®,...
Growth, performance, sexual development, carcass characteristics, and eating quality were evaluated ...
Heifer calves grazing winter wheat pasture and implanted with Synovex-H or Ralgro gained 18 and 14% ...
A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of reimplanting, and of implanting technique, on ...
Implanting incoming feedlot heifers with Ralgro® or Synovex-H® increased weight gain an average of 9...
Implanting heifers initially and mid-way through the finishing period with Ralgro and Synovex-H in a...
Implanting at an alternate location (in the muscle or fat pad at the base of the ear) or crushing th...
Heifers were given either one or two Ralgro implants or one DES implants during the suckling period ...
We assigned 110 cull beef cows of mixed breeding to a control group and a group implanted with 36 mg...
Three hundred and seventy four heifers from two Kansas ranches were used to determine if a single Ra...
The preweaning performance of 221 steer and heifer calves given differing numbers of Ralgro implants...
Over a 3-year period (1976-1978), heifer calves either were not implanted or were implanted between ...
Implanting young bulls with Ralgro® from birth to slaughter maintained performance similar to nonimp...
Finishing yearling beef steers were used to compare various implant programs in a 167-day trial. All...
Two field trials were conducted to compare Ralgro and Compudose for suckling steer calves. Ralgro, R...
Heifers that were flank-spayed plus rumen-ovarian autografted (FS+A) responded similarly to Ralgro®,...
Growth, performance, sexual development, carcass characteristics, and eating quality were evaluated ...
Heifer calves grazing winter wheat pasture and implanted with Synovex-H or Ralgro gained 18 and 14% ...
A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of reimplanting, and of implanting technique, on ...
Implanting incoming feedlot heifers with Ralgro® or Synovex-H® increased weight gain an average of 9...
Implanting heifers initially and mid-way through the finishing period with Ralgro and Synovex-H in a...
Implanting at an alternate location (in the muscle or fat pad at the base of the ear) or crushing th...
Heifers were given either one or two Ralgro implants or one DES implants during the suckling period ...
We assigned 110 cull beef cows of mixed breeding to a control group and a group implanted with 36 mg...
Three hundred and seventy four heifers from two Kansas ranches were used to determine if a single Ra...
The preweaning performance of 221 steer and heifer calves given differing numbers of Ralgro implants...
Over a 3-year period (1976-1978), heifer calves either were not implanted or were implanted between ...
Implanting young bulls with Ralgro® from birth to slaughter maintained performance similar to nonimp...
Finishing yearling beef steers were used to compare various implant programs in a 167-day trial. All...
Two field trials were conducted to compare Ralgro and Compudose for suckling steer calves. Ralgro, R...
Heifers that were flank-spayed plus rumen-ovarian autografted (FS+A) responded similarly to Ralgro®,...
Growth, performance, sexual development, carcass characteristics, and eating quality were evaluated ...
Heifer calves grazing winter wheat pasture and implanted with Synovex-H or Ralgro gained 18 and 14% ...