This article examines John Rawls and Milton Fisk’s conceptions about justiceand goods. We emphasize their main characteristics and differences in theframework of both political liberalism and contemporary social realities. Infirst place, we discuss Rawls’ primary goods concept and its relationshipwith social equality. In particular, we conclude how this concept is closer toprocedimental conditions rather than concrete realities. In second place, wediscuss the Fisk notions of public goods and radical justice following anon–formalist perspective on moral politics based on solidarity projects andsubstantive and collective goods.Este artículo examina las concepciones de justicia y bien desde lasperspectivas de John Rawls y Milton Fisk. Enfatiza...