Add to ORKGThere is an increasing interplay between practical implementations of Sat Solvers and theoretical results about proof complexity. In some cases, theory can be useful for understanding or designing Sat solvers, but the connections are not as strong as might be wished for. This talk will discuss these issues, and make some suggestions for further research directions both for theoreticians and for practitioners.Non UBCUnreviewedAuthor affiliation: University of California, San DiegoFacult
Over the last decades Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers based on conflict-driven clause learning ...
The study of proof complexity was initiated in [Cook and Reckhow 1979] as a way to attack the P vs.N...
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22411 "Theory and Practice of...
This paper is intended as an informal and accessible survey of proof complexity for non-experts, foc...
In this talk, we will present the basic principles of SAT solvers, by focusing on the essential ingr...
Since 2014, several leading theoreticians and experimentalists conducting research on Boolean satisf...
Proving logic formulas is a problem of immense importance both theoretically and practically. On the...
This talk is intended as a selective survey of proof complexity, focusing on some comparatively weak...
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 15171 "Theory and Practice of...
Running a SAT solver on an UNSAT formula produces (implicitly or explicitly) a proof that the formul...
Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) is a keystone in the history of computer science. SAT was the fir...
In this paper we prove an exponential separation between two very similar and natural SAT encodings ...
The past few years have seen an enormous progress in the performance of Boolean satisfiability (SAT)...
I will survey work on exact algorithms for SAT, analyzed by their worst-case complexity. I will ment...
Satisfiability solving, the problem of deciding whether the variables of a propositional formula can...
Over the last decades Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers based on conflict-driven clause learning ...
The study of proof complexity was initiated in [Cook and Reckhow 1979] as a way to attack the P vs.N...
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22411 "Theory and Practice of...
This paper is intended as an informal and accessible survey of proof complexity for non-experts, foc...
In this talk, we will present the basic principles of SAT solvers, by focusing on the essential ingr...
Since 2014, several leading theoreticians and experimentalists conducting research on Boolean satisf...
Proving logic formulas is a problem of immense importance both theoretically and practically. On the...
This talk is intended as a selective survey of proof complexity, focusing on some comparatively weak...
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 15171 "Theory and Practice of...
Running a SAT solver on an UNSAT formula produces (implicitly or explicitly) a proof that the formul...
Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) is a keystone in the history of computer science. SAT was the fir...
In this paper we prove an exponential separation between two very similar and natural SAT encodings ...
The past few years have seen an enormous progress in the performance of Boolean satisfiability (SAT)...
I will survey work on exact algorithms for SAT, analyzed by their worst-case complexity. I will ment...
Satisfiability solving, the problem of deciding whether the variables of a propositional formula can...
Over the last decades Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers based on conflict-driven clause learning ...
The study of proof complexity was initiated in [Cook and Reckhow 1979] as a way to attack the P vs.N...
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22411 "Theory and Practice of...