Background: Selective reporting bias (SRB), the incomplete publication of outcomes measured or of analyses performed in a study, may lead to the over- or underestimation of treatment effects or harms. Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions are required to assess the risk of SRB, achieved in part by applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool to each included randomised trial. The Cochrane Handbook outlines strategies for a comprehensive risk of bias assessment, but the extent to which these are followed by Cochrane review groups (CRGs) has not been assessed to date. The objective of this study was to determine the methods which CRGs require of their authors to address SRB within systematic reviews, and how SRB risk assess...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing da...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>Systematic reviews can include cluster-randomised controlled trials (C-RCTs)...
Abstract Background Selective reporting bias (SRB), t...
Background: Selective reporting is included as a core domain of Cochrane's tool for assessing risk o...
Objective To determine the extent and nature of selective non-reporting of harm outcomes in clinical...
Abstract Background Assessing the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review can be d...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorp...
To examine the prevalence of consequence stating bias, the selection for publication of a subset of ...
<p>Responses in full to a survey distributed to Cochrane review groups regarding selective reporting...
Objective: To determine the extent and nature of selective non-reporting of harm outcomes in clinica...
Background Discrepancies in outcome reporting (DOR) between protocol and published studies include i...
Despite increasing concerns about the validity of published research, the issue of how the scientifi...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing da...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>Systematic reviews can include cluster-randomised controlled trials (C-RCTs)...
Abstract Background Selective reporting bias (SRB), t...
Background: Selective reporting is included as a core domain of Cochrane's tool for assessing risk o...
Objective To determine the extent and nature of selective non-reporting of harm outcomes in clinical...
Abstract Background Assessing the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review can be d...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorp...
To examine the prevalence of consequence stating bias, the selection for publication of a subset of ...
<p>Responses in full to a survey distributed to Cochrane review groups regarding selective reporting...
Objective: To determine the extent and nature of selective non-reporting of harm outcomes in clinica...
Background Discrepancies in outcome reporting (DOR) between protocol and published studies include i...
Despite increasing concerns about the validity of published research, the issue of how the scientifi...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing da...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>Systematic reviews can include cluster-randomised controlled trials (C-RCTs)...