R (on the application of PS) v. G (RMO) and W (SOAD) [2003] EWHC 2335 (Admin). Administrative Court (10th October 2003) Mr. Justice Silber.This is the most recent in a series of cases regarding the scope of the Human Rights Act and compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act 1983. In particular, this case concerns the right of a competent patient detained under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) to refuse anti-psychotic medication, and the scope of articles 3, 8 and 14 of the ECHR
Mental health legislation is often criticised for being fundamentally inconsistent with a rights-bas...
In this study, as capacity is ‘decision-specific’, we have assessed the capacity of men and women to...
R (MH) v (1) Secretary of State for Health (2) Mental Health Review TribunalHouse of Lords, 20 Octob...
R (Wilkinson) v. Broadmoor RMO (1) Mental Health Act Commission (2) Secretary of State for Health (I...
Current English law has few controls on the involuntary treatment of persons detained under the Ment...
The case concerns the right of a psychiatric patient to choose to die by refusing intervention from ...
This case concerns the scope of the compulsory treatment provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983. I...
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for detention and also for treatment which would otherwise be an...
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for compulsory admission to hospital, under criteria designed to...
R (on the application of B) v S and othersCourt of Appeal; Lord Phillips CJ, Thorpe LJ and Rix LJ; 2...
In this paper, the second of two, we consider the capacity of those assessed with respect to their a...
R v Mental Health Review Tribunal, on the application of H [2001] EWCA Civ 415Court of Appeal (28th ...
R (on the application of CS) v Mental Health Review Tribunal; Managers of Homerton Hospital (East Lo...
R (on the application of KB and others) v (1) Mental Health Review Tribunal (2) Secretary ofState fo...
This paper considers what has come to be known as the ‘interface’ between the Mental Capacity Act 20...
Mental health legislation is often criticised for being fundamentally inconsistent with a rights-bas...
In this study, as capacity is ‘decision-specific’, we have assessed the capacity of men and women to...
R (MH) v (1) Secretary of State for Health (2) Mental Health Review TribunalHouse of Lords, 20 Octob...
R (Wilkinson) v. Broadmoor RMO (1) Mental Health Act Commission (2) Secretary of State for Health (I...
Current English law has few controls on the involuntary treatment of persons detained under the Ment...
The case concerns the right of a psychiatric patient to choose to die by refusing intervention from ...
This case concerns the scope of the compulsory treatment provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983. I...
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for detention and also for treatment which would otherwise be an...
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for compulsory admission to hospital, under criteria designed to...
R (on the application of B) v S and othersCourt of Appeal; Lord Phillips CJ, Thorpe LJ and Rix LJ; 2...
In this paper, the second of two, we consider the capacity of those assessed with respect to their a...
R v Mental Health Review Tribunal, on the application of H [2001] EWCA Civ 415Court of Appeal (28th ...
R (on the application of CS) v Mental Health Review Tribunal; Managers of Homerton Hospital (East Lo...
R (on the application of KB and others) v (1) Mental Health Review Tribunal (2) Secretary ofState fo...
This paper considers what has come to be known as the ‘interface’ between the Mental Capacity Act 20...
Mental health legislation is often criticised for being fundamentally inconsistent with a rights-bas...
In this study, as capacity is ‘decision-specific’, we have assessed the capacity of men and women to...
R (MH) v (1) Secretary of State for Health (2) Mental Health Review TribunalHouse of Lords, 20 Octob...