In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) originated the famous “EPR paradox” [1]. This argument concerns two spatially separated particles which have both perfectly correlated positions and momenta, as is predicted possible by quantum mechanics. The EPR paper spurred investigations into the nonlocality of quantum mechanics, leading to a direct challenge of the philosophies taken for granted by most physicists.The EPR conclusion was based on the assumption of local realism, and thus the EPR argument pinpoints a contradiction between local realism and the completeness of quantum mechanics. Einstein’s 1927 gedanken experiment by using the probability representat...
Copyright © 2015 the authors. We show how one can be led from considerations of quantum steering to ...
Two very significant principles with vast ramifications discovered in the 20th century are the Heise...
Tests of the predictions of quantum mechanics for entangled systems have provided increasing evidenc...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) originated the famous “EPR paradox” [1]. This ...
This book is devoted to the presentation of the new quantum mechanical formalism based on the probab...
Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued that the quantum-mechanical probabilistic description of p...
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen (EPR) reported on a thought experiment th...
After pinpointing a conceptual confusion (TCC), a Reality preconception (TRP1), and a fallacious dic...
This Colloquium examines the field of the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) gedanken experiment, f...
A generalization of the 1935 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument for measurements with continuous...
The paradoxes of the EPR experiment with two particles are shown to originate in the implicit assump...
Starting from the late 60’s many experiments have been performed to verify the violation Bell’s ineq...
In 1935 Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published an important paper in which they claimed that ...
We formally link the concept of steering (a concept created by Schrödinger but only recently formali...
The violation of Bell inequalities by quantum physical experiments disproves all relativistic micro ...
Copyright © 2015 the authors. We show how one can be led from considerations of quantum steering to ...
Two very significant principles with vast ramifications discovered in the 20th century are the Heise...
Tests of the predictions of quantum mechanics for entangled systems have provided increasing evidenc...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) originated the famous “EPR paradox” [1]. This ...
This book is devoted to the presentation of the new quantum mechanical formalism based on the probab...
Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued that the quantum-mechanical probabilistic description of p...
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen (EPR) reported on a thought experiment th...
After pinpointing a conceptual confusion (TCC), a Reality preconception (TRP1), and a fallacious dic...
This Colloquium examines the field of the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) gedanken experiment, f...
A generalization of the 1935 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument for measurements with continuous...
The paradoxes of the EPR experiment with two particles are shown to originate in the implicit assump...
Starting from the late 60’s many experiments have been performed to verify the violation Bell’s ineq...
In 1935 Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published an important paper in which they claimed that ...
We formally link the concept of steering (a concept created by Schrödinger but only recently formali...
The violation of Bell inequalities by quantum physical experiments disproves all relativistic micro ...
Copyright © 2015 the authors. We show how one can be led from considerations of quantum steering to ...
Two very significant principles with vast ramifications discovered in the 20th century are the Heise...
Tests of the predictions of quantum mechanics for entangled systems have provided increasing evidenc...