To begin, the so-called ‘selectivity of historical judgment’ is discussed. According to it, writing history requires a comparative criterion of historical relevance. This criterion contains philosophical elements. In Kuhn’s case, the criterion directs historical research and presentation away from Whiggish historiography by postulating a hermeneutic reading of historical sources. This postulate implies some sort of internalism, some sort of rationality of scientific development, and historical realism. To conclude, some consequences of Kuhn’s anti-Whiggism are discussed
History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific ex...
In a journal issue dedicated to a discussion of Steve Fuller\u27s Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical Histo...
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)In this paper I identify a tension betw...
To begin, the so-called 'selectivity of historical judgment' is discussed. According to it, writing ...
To begin, the so-called ‘selectivity of historical judgment’ is discussed. According to it, writing ...
The paper deals with the interrelations between the philosophy, sociology and historiography of scie...
In this paper the author gives an exposition of T.S. Kuhn’s contribution to the philosophy and hist...
Philosophy of science and history of science both have a significant relation to science itself; but...
This paper addresses the relationship between the history and philosophy of science by way of the is...
O objetivo central de nosso trabalho é analisar criticamente os aspectos centrais do modelo de histo...
Many philosophers have thought that Kuhn’s claim that there have been paradigm shifts introduced a p...
In the paper I will, first, address certain apparent tensions in relation to Kuhn’s legacy in the hi...
History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific ex...
In this article I argue that a methodological challenge to an integrated history and philosophy of s...
The publication of Thomas S. Kuhn’s "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in 1962 stands for a turni...
History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific ex...
In a journal issue dedicated to a discussion of Steve Fuller\u27s Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical Histo...
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)In this paper I identify a tension betw...
To begin, the so-called 'selectivity of historical judgment' is discussed. According to it, writing ...
To begin, the so-called ‘selectivity of historical judgment’ is discussed. According to it, writing ...
The paper deals with the interrelations between the philosophy, sociology and historiography of scie...
In this paper the author gives an exposition of T.S. Kuhn’s contribution to the philosophy and hist...
Philosophy of science and history of science both have a significant relation to science itself; but...
This paper addresses the relationship between the history and philosophy of science by way of the is...
O objetivo central de nosso trabalho é analisar criticamente os aspectos centrais do modelo de histo...
Many philosophers have thought that Kuhn’s claim that there have been paradigm shifts introduced a p...
In the paper I will, first, address certain apparent tensions in relation to Kuhn’s legacy in the hi...
History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific ex...
In this article I argue that a methodological challenge to an integrated history and philosophy of s...
The publication of Thomas S. Kuhn’s "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in 1962 stands for a turni...
History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific ex...
In a journal issue dedicated to a discussion of Steve Fuller\u27s Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical Histo...
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)In this paper I identify a tension betw...