Add to ORKGA growing interest in living labs as a mechanism for innovation has drawn significant attention to both the different flavours of this methodology and to the organizations that put it into practice. However, little has been done to assess its impact and to compare its contribution to other innovation methodologies. This article aims to cover that gap by summarizing the most common European living labs approaches and positioning them in the landscape of user-contributed innovation methodology. The merits and appropriateness of living labs in these settings are also assessed
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Open Innovation scholars as well as practitioners are still struggling with the practical implementa...
International audienceNew paradigms, such as Open Innovation (Chesbrough, 2003) and Web 2.0 (O'Reill...
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Living labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As...
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Living labs bring experimentation out of companies’ R&D departments to real-life environments with t...
Living Labs have received limited attention in the literature despite their diffusion throughout Eur...
Open and User Innovation present two ways of looking at distributed innovation processes. However, a...
The advantages of innovation strategies that are based on collaboration with users have been demonst...
This paper focuses on the problem of facilitating sustainable innovation practices with a user-cente...
Initially developed to bridge the gap between research and market, a Living Lab can be described as ...
Living Labs as seen as a rather new research area with only a limited amount of supporting theories ...
Despite the growing popularity of using living labs as innovation platforms and the increasing schol...
In this paper we present the Living Lab methodology as an overall framework for in-situ open innovat...
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Open Innovation scholars as well as practitioners are still struggling with the practical implementa...
International audienceNew paradigms, such as Open Innovation (Chesbrough, 2003) and Web 2.0 (O'Reill...
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Living labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As...
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Living labs bring experimentation out of companies’ R&D departments to real-life environments with t...
Living Labs have received limited attention in the literature despite their diffusion throughout Eur...
Open and User Innovation present two ways of looking at distributed innovation processes. However, a...
The advantages of innovation strategies that are based on collaboration with users have been demonst...
This paper focuses on the problem of facilitating sustainable innovation practices with a user-cente...
Initially developed to bridge the gap between research and market, a Living Lab can be described as ...
Living Labs as seen as a rather new research area with only a limited amount of supporting theories ...
Despite the growing popularity of using living labs as innovation platforms and the increasing schol...
In this paper we present the Living Lab methodology as an overall framework for in-situ open innovat...
Despite almost a decade of living lab activity all over Europe, there still is a lack of empirical r...
Open Innovation scholars as well as practitioners are still struggling with the practical implementa...
International audienceNew paradigms, such as Open Innovation (Chesbrough, 2003) and Web 2.0 (O'Reill...