Kraepelin's methodology and clinical descriptions are still influential in the XXIst century psychiatry. Concerning schizophrenia, the author questions the internal cohesion and predicitve validity of the actual "phenotypes", returning to Kraepelin's concepts regarding the psychopathology and evolution of the disease. The author suggests that the validation of such concepts could influence research and clinical practice
Much of the current research-work into biological basis of mental disorders is predicted on implicit...
The Kraepelinian dichotomy — the broad division of the major mood and psychotic illnesses of adultho...
Introduction: A century ago, Kraepelin stated that the distinctive feature of schizophrenia was prog...
Psychiatry is a young, still developing science, that must, against sharp opposition, gradually achi...
Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical scie...
Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical scie...
The nosology for major psychiatric disorders developed by Emil Kraepelin in the 1890s has substantia...
Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his...
In an article of 1920 entitled "Die Erscheinungsformen, des Irreseins," published in Kraepelin's pha...
This paper reviews the importance Emil Kraepelin put on disease course as a classificatory principle...
The fundamentals of Kraepelin's theory have been revisited by researchers known as "neokraepelians",...
Kraepelins concept of dementia praecox and Bleulers concept of the group of schizophrenias differ ma...
Throughout its development, psychiatry has struggled to legitimate itself as a scientific and medica...
This is not only of formal importance, but an essential for diagnosis, the institution of treatment,...
There is a debate in psychiatry regarding whether it is better to use neo-Kraepelinian diagnostic ca...
Much of the current research-work into biological basis of mental disorders is predicted on implicit...
The Kraepelinian dichotomy — the broad division of the major mood and psychotic illnesses of adultho...
Introduction: A century ago, Kraepelin stated that the distinctive feature of schizophrenia was prog...
Psychiatry is a young, still developing science, that must, against sharp opposition, gradually achi...
Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical scie...
Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) was an influential figure in the history of psychiatry as a clinical scie...
The nosology for major psychiatric disorders developed by Emil Kraepelin in the 1890s has substantia...
Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his...
In an article of 1920 entitled "Die Erscheinungsformen, des Irreseins," published in Kraepelin's pha...
This paper reviews the importance Emil Kraepelin put on disease course as a classificatory principle...
The fundamentals of Kraepelin's theory have been revisited by researchers known as "neokraepelians",...
Kraepelins concept of dementia praecox and Bleulers concept of the group of schizophrenias differ ma...
Throughout its development, psychiatry has struggled to legitimate itself as a scientific and medica...
This is not only of formal importance, but an essential for diagnosis, the institution of treatment,...
There is a debate in psychiatry regarding whether it is better to use neo-Kraepelinian diagnostic ca...
Much of the current research-work into biological basis of mental disorders is predicted on implicit...
The Kraepelinian dichotomy — the broad division of the major mood and psychotic illnesses of adultho...
Introduction: A century ago, Kraepelin stated that the distinctive feature of schizophrenia was prog...