On July, 19, Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe gave his Opinion in the Tele2 case. The CJEU is asked to clarify whether the blanket data retention obligation imposed on ISPs is compliant with the EU Charter. The matter has been the focus of heated debates between civil society and public authorities. This Opinion gives us a first hint on the interpretation that should be given to the Digital Rights Ireland judgement as regard mass collection of traffic data. In a context of repeated terrorist attacks, the issue is of utmost importance.available at: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/to-retain-or-not-to-retaina-decision-up-to-each-member-state/status: publishe
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
In November 2016 the Investigatory Powers Act ('IPA') received Royal Assent. IPA was hailed by the G...
Whenever a telephone or a computer device connected to the network is used, the telecommunication se...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...
In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the...
Recent technological developments have brought into question the protection of personal data and ind...
The chapter explores the fate of the Data Retention Directive, the Digital Rights Ireland case and i...
The EU Electronic Privacy Directive of 2002 requires members to ensure the confidentiality of commun...
Possession of accurate, complete and reliable relevant data on electronic communications traffic and...
In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which...
In December 2005 the European Parliament passed a directive about Data Retention that obliges every ...
The opinion of the CJEU Attorney General on mass data retention has been long awaited by anyone inte...
Directive 2006/24/EC sets out data retention rules and is a useful tool for the investigation, detec...
The EU Electronic Privacy Directive 20021 requires Member States to ensure the confidentiality of co...
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
In November 2016 the Investigatory Powers Act ('IPA') received Royal Assent. IPA was hailed by the G...
Whenever a telephone or a computer device connected to the network is used, the telecommunication se...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...
In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the...
Recent technological developments have brought into question the protection of personal data and ind...
The chapter explores the fate of the Data Retention Directive, the Digital Rights Ireland case and i...
The EU Electronic Privacy Directive of 2002 requires members to ensure the confidentiality of commun...
Possession of accurate, complete and reliable relevant data on electronic communications traffic and...
In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which...
In December 2005 the European Parliament passed a directive about Data Retention that obliges every ...
The opinion of the CJEU Attorney General on mass data retention has been long awaited by anyone inte...
Directive 2006/24/EC sets out data retention rules and is a useful tool for the investigation, detec...
The EU Electronic Privacy Directive 20021 requires Member States to ensure the confidentiality of co...
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
In November 2016 the Investigatory Powers Act ('IPA') received Royal Assent. IPA was hailed by the G...
Whenever a telephone or a computer device connected to the network is used, the telecommunication se...