International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments in an abstract argumentation framework, by providing a ranking on arguments. This paper aims at going towards a generalization of the construction of such semantics, by investigating subsumption and incompatibility cases that may arise when principles that may enter into their composition are combined
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
International audienceArgumentation reasoning is a way for agents to evaluate a situation. Given a f...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments ...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A w...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceArgumentation aims at increasing acceptability of claims by supporting them wi...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceAn argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a seman...
International audienceExtension-based semantics evaluate the acceptability of sets of arguments, whi...
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
International audienceArgumentation reasoning is a way for agents to evaluate a situation. Given a f...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments ...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A w...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceArgumentation aims at increasing acceptability of claims by supporting them wi...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceAn argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a seman...
International audienceExtension-based semantics evaluate the acceptability of sets of arguments, whi...
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
International audienceArgumentation reasoning is a way for agents to evaluate a situation. Given a f...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...