Add to ORKGNot AvailableAnalyzed were the length–weight relationship (LWR) and length–length relationship (LLR) of two fish species, Strongylura strongylura (family Belonidae) and Hyporhamphus limbatus (family Hemiramphidae) from Chilika Lake, India. A total of 616 specimens were sampled bi- monthly from August 2014 to June 2016 using seine nets and screen barrier nets operated by local fishermen that were used for the present estimates.Not Availabl
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableThe basic informations on length-weight relationships for a number of small indigenous ...
Not AvailableThis study reports the length–weight relationships (LWRs) of Rastrelliger brachysoma (...
Not AvailableThe length-weight relationships (LWRs) were studied of 588 fish covering eight families...
Not AvailableThe length-weight relationships (LWRs) were studied of 588 fish covering eight families...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) of three fish species: Scomberomorus commerson, Ale...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) were determined for seven riverine fish species from...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) were evaluated for Badis badis (n = 25), Sperata see...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships are described for six fish species belonging to two familie...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableLength-weight relationships (LWRs) are described for 10 fish species belonging to three...
Not AvailablePresent study provides length–weight relationships (LWRs) and length–length relationshi...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) are described for 21 fish species belonging to six f...
Not AvailablePresent study provides length–weight relationships (LWRs) and length–length relationshi...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableThe basic informations on length-weight relationships for a number of small indigenous ...
Not AvailableThis study reports the length–weight relationships (LWRs) of Rastrelliger brachysoma (...
Not AvailableThe length-weight relationships (LWRs) were studied of 588 fish covering eight families...
Not AvailableThe length-weight relationships (LWRs) were studied of 588 fish covering eight families...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) of three fish species: Scomberomorus commerson, Ale...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) were determined for seven riverine fish species from...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) were evaluated for Badis badis (n = 25), Sperata see...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships are described for six fish species belonging to two familie...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableLength-weight relationships (LWRs) are described for 10 fish species belonging to three...
Not AvailablePresent study provides length–weight relationships (LWRs) and length–length relationshi...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) are described for 21 fish species belonging to six f...
Not AvailablePresent study provides length–weight relationships (LWRs) and length–length relationshi...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWRs) for five indigenous fish species under five genera a...
Not AvailableThe basic informations on length-weight relationships for a number of small indigenous ...
Not AvailableThis study reports the length–weight relationships (LWRs) of Rastrelliger brachysoma (...