International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Ranking-based semantics received a lot of attention recently. All of the semantics introduced so far are applicable to binary attack relations. In this paper, we study a more general case when sets of arguments can jointly attack an argument. We generalise existing postulates for ranking-based semantics to fit this framework, define a general variant of h-categoriser, prove that it converges for every argumentation framework and study the postulates it satisfies. We also study the link between binary and hypergraph version of h-categoriser
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceAn argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a seman...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
Abstract. Recently, ranking-based semantics is proposed to rank-order argu-ments from the most accep...
International audienceAn argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The node...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceAn argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a seman...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
Abstract. Recently, ranking-based semantics is proposed to rank-order argu-ments from the most accep...
International audienceAn argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The node...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...