Social experiments have been used in research since the 1960s, yet the technique of controlled experimentation still arouses controversy among social scientists. The crucial element that distinguishes a controlled experiment from other forms of research is random assignment of treatment to the observational units of study. Because treatment differences in the sample occur as a result of random chance, the effects of the treatment on behavior can be measured with high reliability. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of experiments in comparison with other research techniques and describes the circumstances where randomized trials should be preferred over other methods.
International audienceWhile the history and methodology of laboratory experiments in economics have ...
Policy experiments represent a powerful tool for testing the consequences of contemplated social pro...
This note suggests that it is sometimes possible to apply true experimental designs in field setting...
views are those of the author alone. yale_ms_v4.wpd 10/7/03 One of the areas of policy research wher...
We review the argumentsfor and against randomized field experiments design to address important ques...
In this paper, the strengths and weakness of randomized field experiments are discussed. Although it...
This paper considers the recent case for randomized social experimentation and contrasts it with old...
Using field experiments, scholars can identify causal effects via randomiza- tion while studying peo...
One of the areas of policy research where randomized field trials have been utilized most intensivel...
Social experiments have been widely utilised in evaluations of social programmes in the US to identi...
In a randomised controlled experiment, some of the experimental units (e.g., people, schools, inters...
Voter mobilization experiments are often conducted using individual-level randomization, which can b...
International audienceOver the years, randomized control trials (RCTs) have become a standard method...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from De Gruyter via the DOI i...
International audienceWhile the history and methodology of laboratory experiments in economics have ...
Policy experiments represent a powerful tool for testing the consequences of contemplated social pro...
This note suggests that it is sometimes possible to apply true experimental designs in field setting...
views are those of the author alone. yale_ms_v4.wpd 10/7/03 One of the areas of policy research wher...
We review the argumentsfor and against randomized field experiments design to address important ques...
In this paper, the strengths and weakness of randomized field experiments are discussed. Although it...
This paper considers the recent case for randomized social experimentation and contrasts it with old...
Using field experiments, scholars can identify causal effects via randomiza- tion while studying peo...
One of the areas of policy research where randomized field trials have been utilized most intensivel...
Social experiments have been widely utilised in evaluations of social programmes in the US to identi...
In a randomised controlled experiment, some of the experimental units (e.g., people, schools, inters...
Voter mobilization experiments are often conducted using individual-level randomization, which can b...
International audienceOver the years, randomized control trials (RCTs) have become a standard method...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from De Gruyter via the DOI i...
International audienceWhile the history and methodology of laboratory experiments in economics have ...
Policy experiments represent a powerful tool for testing the consequences of contemplated social pro...
This note suggests that it is sometimes possible to apply true experimental designs in field setting...