Let us adopt the classical point of view that a theory of games is a description of "rational" behavior. Consequently, equipped with a book entitled "Theory of Games," any individual in any strategic situation need only consult the book to make a "rational" decision. One of the questions to address in this context is indeed whether or not strategies other than those provided by backward induction can ever appear in such a book. In offering an answer, we shall also explore the logical limits within which any "Theory of Games" must operate.
A central question in game theory, learning, and other fields is how a rational intelligent agent sh...
The paper examines the extent to which game theory can be derived from a strictly Bayesian or decisi...
This paper presents a first attempt to bridge the gap between logical and cognitive treatments of st...
Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on May 21, 2012).The entire t...
The aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for representing interacting agents in the co...
AbstractThe aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for representing interacting agents i...
Edited by Hans van Ditmarsch, David Fernández Duque, Valentin Goranko, Wojtek Jamroga, Manuel Ojeda-...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
The aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for representing inter-acting agents in the c...
Taking seriously the philosophical foundations of classical strategic theories of choice-making we s...
We construct a dynamic epistemic model for extensive form games, which generates a hierarchy of beli...
We introduce a class of extensive form games whereplayers might not be able to foresee the possible ...
This paper continues the dynamic modal logic analysis provided by van Benthem [5] of procedural rati...
We consider strategic-form games with ordinal payoffs and provide a syntactic analysis of common bel...
In a large family of solution concepts for boundedly rational players — allowing players to be imper...
A central question in game theory, learning, and other fields is how a rational intelligent agent sh...
The paper examines the extent to which game theory can be derived from a strictly Bayesian or decisi...
This paper presents a first attempt to bridge the gap between logical and cognitive treatments of st...
Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on May 21, 2012).The entire t...
The aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for representing interacting agents in the co...
AbstractThe aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for representing interacting agents i...
Edited by Hans van Ditmarsch, David Fernández Duque, Valentin Goranko, Wojtek Jamroga, Manuel Ojeda-...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
The aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for representing inter-acting agents in the c...
Taking seriously the philosophical foundations of classical strategic theories of choice-making we s...
We construct a dynamic epistemic model for extensive form games, which generates a hierarchy of beli...
We introduce a class of extensive form games whereplayers might not be able to foresee the possible ...
This paper continues the dynamic modal logic analysis provided by van Benthem [5] of procedural rati...
We consider strategic-form games with ordinal payoffs and provide a syntactic analysis of common bel...
In a large family of solution concepts for boundedly rational players — allowing players to be imper...
A central question in game theory, learning, and other fields is how a rational intelligent agent sh...
The paper examines the extent to which game theory can be derived from a strictly Bayesian or decisi...
This paper presents a first attempt to bridge the gap between logical and cognitive treatments of st...