One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimental and real-world settings. We show that the decline of cooperation is driven by individual preferences for imperfect conditional cooperation. Many people’s desire to contribute less than others, rather than changing beliefs of what others will contribute over time or people’s heterogeneity in preferences makes voluntary cooperation fragile. Universal free riding thus eventually emerges, despite the fact that most people are not selfish.Public goods experiments, social preferences, conditional cooperation, free riding
It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher leve...
What makes people cooperate? How can one design mechanisms in order to incentivize players to contri...
Human societies are unique in the level of cooperation among non-kin. Evolutionary models explaining...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimenta...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimenta...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimenta...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contribu tions to public goods decline over time in experiment...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and ...
We provide a test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and its dec...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and ...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and ...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences in voluntary cooperation. We elicit indiv...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences in voluntary cooperation. We elicit indiv...
In finitely repeated laboratory public goods games contributions start at about 40 to 60 percent of ...
We adopt an evolutionary approach to investigate whether and when conditional cooperation can explai...
It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher leve...
What makes people cooperate? How can one design mechanisms in order to incentivize players to contri...
Human societies are unique in the level of cooperation among non-kin. Evolutionary models explaining...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimenta...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimenta...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimenta...
One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contribu tions to public goods decline over time in experiment...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and ...
We provide a test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and its dec...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and ...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences and beliefs in voluntary cooperation and ...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences in voluntary cooperation. We elicit indiv...
We provide a direct test of the role of social preferences in voluntary cooperation. We elicit indiv...
In finitely repeated laboratory public goods games contributions start at about 40 to 60 percent of ...
We adopt an evolutionary approach to investigate whether and when conditional cooperation can explai...
It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher leve...
What makes people cooperate? How can one design mechanisms in order to incentivize players to contri...
Human societies are unique in the level of cooperation among non-kin. Evolutionary models explaining...