Describes two examples (in France and in the US) of replication of the Danish procedure of the consensus conference for public participation in nanotechnology, and argues that emphasis on the evaluation of the participatory procedure should not be made at the expense of richer analysis of the problematisation of public participation fostered by such policy instruments.Science and technology studies, public participation, consensus conferences, democracy, controversies, political sociology, nanotechnology, France
peer reviewedIn participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities co...
International audienceWhat would be the reactions of the public if nanotechnologies do not contribut...
"Public engagement in science" is one of the buzzwords that, since 2000, has been used in nanotechno...
http://www.csi.ensmp.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_018.pdfCSI WORKING PAPERS SE...
Presents a case study on public participation in controversies on nanotechnologies in France, and pr...
In this paper, we examine two methods of public participation, namely consensus conference (conféren...
An examination of nanotechnology as a lens through which to study contemporary democracy in both the...
This special issue of the CIPAST newsletter was prepared by Nicolas Baya Laffite at INRA/TSV. It pro...
In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats that seek to democratically ...
It is said that democratic societies should have democratic processes for making science and technol...
Democratic reformers are attracted by the role that advisory forums composed of lay citizens can pla...
International audienceTechnologies of democracy are instruments based on material apparatus, social ...
This article draws attention to struggles inherent in discourse about the meaning of participation i...
In participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities convene to shar...
The dissertation analyzes nanotechnology as a macro political entity comprising objects, futures, co...
peer reviewedIn participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities co...
International audienceWhat would be the reactions of the public if nanotechnologies do not contribut...
"Public engagement in science" is one of the buzzwords that, since 2000, has been used in nanotechno...
http://www.csi.ensmp.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_018.pdfCSI WORKING PAPERS SE...
Presents a case study on public participation in controversies on nanotechnologies in France, and pr...
In this paper, we examine two methods of public participation, namely consensus conference (conféren...
An examination of nanotechnology as a lens through which to study contemporary democracy in both the...
This special issue of the CIPAST newsletter was prepared by Nicolas Baya Laffite at INRA/TSV. It pro...
In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats that seek to democratically ...
It is said that democratic societies should have democratic processes for making science and technol...
Democratic reformers are attracted by the role that advisory forums composed of lay citizens can pla...
International audienceTechnologies of democracy are instruments based on material apparatus, social ...
This article draws attention to struggles inherent in discourse about the meaning of participation i...
In participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities convene to shar...
The dissertation analyzes nanotechnology as a macro political entity comprising objects, futures, co...
peer reviewedIn participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities co...
International audienceWhat would be the reactions of the public if nanotechnologies do not contribut...
"Public engagement in science" is one of the buzzwords that, since 2000, has been used in nanotechno...