This paper is motivated by the open question whether the union of two disjoint NPcomplete sets always is NP-complete. We discover that such unions retain much of the complexity of their single components. More precisely, they are complete with respect to more general reducibilities. Moreover, we approach the main question in a more general way: We analyze the scope of the complexity of unions of m-equivalent disjoint sets. Under the hypothesis that NE � = coNE, we construct degrees in NP where our main question has a positive answer, i.e., these degrees are closed under unions of disjoint sets. Document created: 28th April 2006
AbstractFor a propositional proof system P we introduce the complexity class DNPP(P) of all disjoint...
AbstractThis paper follows the methodology introduced by Agrawal and Biswas in [Manindra Agrawal, So...
3noWe carry on a long-standing investigation aimed at identifying fragments of set theory that are p...
This paper is motivated by the open question whether the union of two disjoint NP-complete sets alwa...
AbstractThis paper is motivated by the open question whether the union of two disjoint NP-complete s...
A simple technique is developed for manipulating the relative complexity of sets with respect to pol...
For a proof system P we introduce the complexity class DNPP(P) of all disjoint NP-pairs for which th...
We investigate the connection between propositional proof systems and their canonical pairs. It is k...
We investigate the connection between propositional proof systems and their canonical pairs. It is k...
Disjoint NP-pairs are a well studied complexity theoretic concept with important applications in cry...
AbstractWe prove that every disjoint NP-pair is polynomial-time, many-one equivalent to the canonica...
For a propositional proof system P we introduce the complexity class of all disjoint -pairs for whic...
We prove that every disjoint NP-pair is polynomial-time, many-one equivalent to the canon-ical disjo...
Denote X the class of sets relative to which P = NP relativized and Z the class of sets relative to ...
We use hypotheses of structural complexity theory to separate various NP-com-pleteness notions. In p...
AbstractFor a propositional proof system P we introduce the complexity class DNPP(P) of all disjoint...
AbstractThis paper follows the methodology introduced by Agrawal and Biswas in [Manindra Agrawal, So...
3noWe carry on a long-standing investigation aimed at identifying fragments of set theory that are p...
This paper is motivated by the open question whether the union of two disjoint NP-complete sets alwa...
AbstractThis paper is motivated by the open question whether the union of two disjoint NP-complete s...
A simple technique is developed for manipulating the relative complexity of sets with respect to pol...
For a proof system P we introduce the complexity class DNPP(P) of all disjoint NP-pairs for which th...
We investigate the connection between propositional proof systems and their canonical pairs. It is k...
We investigate the connection between propositional proof systems and their canonical pairs. It is k...
Disjoint NP-pairs are a well studied complexity theoretic concept with important applications in cry...
AbstractWe prove that every disjoint NP-pair is polynomial-time, many-one equivalent to the canonica...
For a propositional proof system P we introduce the complexity class of all disjoint -pairs for whic...
We prove that every disjoint NP-pair is polynomial-time, many-one equivalent to the canon-ical disjo...
Denote X the class of sets relative to which P = NP relativized and Z the class of sets relative to ...
We use hypotheses of structural complexity theory to separate various NP-com-pleteness notions. In p...
AbstractFor a propositional proof system P we introduce the complexity class DNPP(P) of all disjoint...
AbstractThis paper follows the methodology introduced by Agrawal and Biswas in [Manindra Agrawal, So...
3noWe carry on a long-standing investigation aimed at identifying fragments of set theory that are p...