Deliverable D3.4.1(WP3.4) In this document we propose a general framework for reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. We present formal definitions of soundness, meaningfulness, local completeness, and maximal completeness of an inconsistency reasoner. We propose and investigate a pre-processing algorithm and discuss the strategies of inconsistency reasoning based on pre-defined selection functions dealing with concept relevance. In this document, we also present a prototype of a reasoner for Processing Inconsistent ONtologies (PION), which is implemented in XDIG, an extended DIG Description Logic Interface for Prolog. We also discuss how the syntactic relevance can be use
We present a preliminary framework for reasoning with possibly inconsistent Description Logic ontolo...
Deliverable D3.6.1(WP3.6)In this document, we present a framework for inconsistent ontology diagnosi...
In many situations humans have to reason with inconsistent knowledge. These inconsistencies may occu...
In this extended abstract 1 we present a framework of reasoning with inconsistent ontologies, in whi...
In this paper we present a framework of reasoning with inconsistent ontologies, in which pre-defined...
Deliverable D3.6.3(WP3.6) In this document, we overview the framework for inconsistent ontology diag...
As classical reasoning from inconsistent ontologies can't give meaningful answers to queries, it is ...
Re-using and combining multiple ontologies on the Web is bound to lead to inconsistencies between th...
The Web Ontology Languages define a rich machine readable language for knowledge representation on t...
The ability to deal with inconsistency and to accommodate change is of utmost importance in real-wor...
International audienceOntologies are at the heart of the Semantic Web technologies. This paper intro...
International audienceThere are several proposals to deal with inconsistencies in DL ontologies thro...
Abstract: Ontology driven architecture has revolutionized the inference system by allowing interope...
This paper presents an argumentation framework for reasoning and management in (inconsistent or inco...
We present a preliminary framework for reasoning with possibly inconsistent Description Logic ontolo...
Deliverable D3.6.1(WP3.6)In this document, we present a framework for inconsistent ontology diagnosi...
In many situations humans have to reason with inconsistent knowledge. These inconsistencies may occu...
In this extended abstract 1 we present a framework of reasoning with inconsistent ontologies, in whi...
In this paper we present a framework of reasoning with inconsistent ontologies, in which pre-defined...
Deliverable D3.6.3(WP3.6) In this document, we overview the framework for inconsistent ontology diag...
As classical reasoning from inconsistent ontologies can't give meaningful answers to queries, it is ...
Re-using and combining multiple ontologies on the Web is bound to lead to inconsistencies between th...
The Web Ontology Languages define a rich machine readable language for knowledge representation on t...
The ability to deal with inconsistency and to accommodate change is of utmost importance in real-wor...
International audienceOntologies are at the heart of the Semantic Web technologies. This paper intro...
International audienceThere are several proposals to deal with inconsistencies in DL ontologies thro...
Abstract: Ontology driven architecture has revolutionized the inference system by allowing interope...
This paper presents an argumentation framework for reasoning and management in (inconsistent or inco...
We present a preliminary framework for reasoning with possibly inconsistent Description Logic ontolo...
Deliverable D3.6.1(WP3.6)In this document, we present a framework for inconsistent ontology diagnosi...
In many situations humans have to reason with inconsistent knowledge. These inconsistencies may occu...