Energy consumption and garbage collection in low-powered computing

We have measured the energy efficiency of different memory management strategies on a high performance pocket computer. We conducted our study by measuring the energy consumption of eight C programs with four different memory management strategies each. The memory management strategies are: no deallocation, explicit deallocation, conservative mark-and-sweep garbage collection, and conservative mark-and-sweep incremental garbage collection. Our measurements show that different memory management strategies have very different energy requirements. In the most extreme case, one program consumed 40 times as much energy with incremental garbage collection than with explicit deallocation. We demonstrate that, although overall energy use is strongly correlated with execution time, the processor and peripheral energies separately do not correlate well with execution time