We present di#erent constructions for non-prioritized belief revision, that is, belief changes in which the input sentences are not always accepted. First, we present the concept of explanation in a deductive way. Second, we define multiple revision operators with respect to sets of sentences (representing explanations), giving representation theorems. Finally, we relate the formulated operators with argumentative systems and default reasoning frameworks
In this article we are presenting a new perspective on the matter of belief revision by its relation...
This chapter aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model...
This paper studies information changes in default justification logic with argumentation semantics. ...
AbstractWe present different constructions for nonprioritized belief revision, that is, belief chang...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief revision leads to temporal nonmonotonicity, i.e., the set of beliefs does not grow monotonica...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
In this article we are presenting a new perspective on the matter of belief revision by its relation...
This chapter aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model...
This paper studies information changes in default justification logic with argumentation semantics. ...
AbstractWe present different constructions for nonprioritized belief revision, that is, belief chang...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief revision leads to temporal nonmonotonicity, i.e., the set of beliefs does not grow monotonica...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
For propositional beliefs, there are well-established connections between belief revision, defeasibl...
In this article we are presenting a new perspective on the matter of belief revision by its relation...
This chapter aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model...
This paper studies information changes in default justification logic with argumentation semantics. ...