We present the proof theory and the model theory of a monotonic framework for default reasoning, and we extend logic programming techniques to this framework. Standard formalizations of default reasoning do not syntactically separate between hard knowledge and conjectural knowledge. Such a separation is fundamental in our framework. To illustrate our approach, we show how it solves the Yale Shooting problem. 1 Introduction To make this paper somewhat conceptually self-contained, we first recall very briefly some general notions on logic programming with ions. We then explain how we apply these ideas to non-monotonic reasoning. Ions have been introduced in [3] for expressing generalized SLD-derivations in a framework where more than one lo...
In the field of knowledge representation, argumentation is usually considered as an abstract framewo...
In this paper ’ I ask, and attempt to answer, the following question: What’s Wrong with Non-Monotoni...
peer reviewedWe present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework...
this paper is to present an account of these recent developments. The paper is organized as follows....
Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing non-- monotonic reasoning prob...
AbstractOur purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing non-monotonic reasonin...
We provide a simple formulation of a framework where some extensions of logic programming with non-m...
Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing nonmonotonic reasoning problem...
AbstractWe provide a simple formulation of a framework where some extensions of logic programming wi...
In this paper, we investigate the proof theory of default reasoning. We generalize Reiter's fra...
We define abstract proof procedures for performing credulous and sceptical non-monotonic reasoning, ...
Abstract. We introduce the new paradigm of High-Level Non-Monotonic reasoning (HLNM). This paradigm ...
"Non-monotonic" logical systems are logics in which the introduction of new axioms can invalidate ...
This article aims to propagate Logic Programming as a formal tool to deal with non-monotonic reasoni...
peer reviewedWe present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework...
In the field of knowledge representation, argumentation is usually considered as an abstract framewo...
In this paper ’ I ask, and attempt to answer, the following question: What’s Wrong with Non-Monotoni...
peer reviewedWe present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework...
this paper is to present an account of these recent developments. The paper is organized as follows....
Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing non-- monotonic reasoning prob...
AbstractOur purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing non-monotonic reasonin...
We provide a simple formulation of a framework where some extensions of logic programming with non-m...
Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing nonmonotonic reasoning problem...
AbstractWe provide a simple formulation of a framework where some extensions of logic programming wi...
In this paper, we investigate the proof theory of default reasoning. We generalize Reiter's fra...
We define abstract proof procedures for performing credulous and sceptical non-monotonic reasoning, ...
Abstract. We introduce the new paradigm of High-Level Non-Monotonic reasoning (HLNM). This paradigm ...
"Non-monotonic" logical systems are logics in which the introduction of new axioms can invalidate ...
This article aims to propagate Logic Programming as a formal tool to deal with non-monotonic reasoni...
peer reviewedWe present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework...
In the field of knowledge representation, argumentation is usually considered as an abstract framewo...
In this paper ’ I ask, and attempt to answer, the following question: What’s Wrong with Non-Monotoni...
peer reviewedWe present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework...