this paper that consideration of typologically diverse languages shows that this design decision in the architecture of Universal Grammar is mistaken. After outlining my approach to argument structure, I briefly present four situations in which there are mismatches between argument structure and grammatical relations and argue from that evidence that the core constraints of binding theory -- both the definition of binding domains and the relationship between an anaphor and its antecedent -- should rather be described in terms of argument structure configurations. I then outline what an argument-structure-based account of binding looks like, before concluding with some discussion about how far this account can be pushed -- about what other f...