The Sorites Fallacy and the Context-dependence of Vague Predicates

this paper is the following. Section 2 will briefly review how context sets have come up in recent natural language research. Section 3 applies the idea of contextualization to the crucial inductive premiss of the sorites argument. Section 4 shows how a properly contextualized version of the paradoxical argument breaks down. Up to and including section 4, I will make use of a convenient simplication, by making some highly specific assumptions about what it can mean for an object x to be `small with respect to a comparison set' A. Section 5 will relinquish that assumption and ask on what more general assumptions about the meaning of S(x