Depth from Defocus vs. Stereo: How Different Really are They?

Depth from Focus (DFF) and Depth from Defocus (DFD) methods are shown to be realizations of the geometric triangulation principle. Fundamentally, the depth sensitivities of DFF and DFD are not different than those of stereo (or motion) based systems having the same physical dimensions. Contrary to common belief, DFD does not inherently avoid the matching (correspondence) problem. Basically, DFD and DFF do not avoid the occlusion problem any more than triangulation techniques, but they are more stable in the presence of such disruptions. The fundamental advantage of DFF and DFD methods is the two-dimensionality of the aperture, allowing more robust estimation. These results elucidate the limitations of methods based on depth of field and provide a foundation for fair performance comparison between DFF/DFD and shape from stereo (or motion) algorithms. 1. Introduction In recent years range estimation based on the limited depth of field (DOF) of lenses has been gaining popularity. These m..