© 2014 Elsevier Inc. All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This can generate a time-inconsistency problem. From an ex-ante perspective, Courts will have the ex-post temptation to be excessively lenient. This observation is at the root of the rule of precedent, known as stare decisis.Stare decisis forces Courts to weigh the benefits of leniency towards the current parties against the beneficial effects that tougher decisions have on future ones.We study these dynamics and find that stare decisis guarantees that precedents evolve towards ex-ante efficient decisions, thus alleviating the Courts' time-inconsistency problem. However, the dynamics do not converge to full efficiency
The Supreme Court follows the Doctrine of Stare Decisis, of which dictates that the Court must follo...
The doctrine of stare decisis remains a defining feature of American law despite challenges to its l...
In Kisor v. Wilkie, the Supreme Court recently confronted whether to overrule the doctrine under whi...
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This can generate a time-inconsiste...
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This might generate a time-inconsis...
'Stare Decisis' or 'stay with what has been decided' has long been understood as a fundamental prin...
Stare decisis has been called many things, among them a principle of policy, a series of prudential ...
When courts deliberate on the implications of a precedent case in the adjudication of a new dispute,...
Additional contributor: Timothy Johnson (faculty mentor).Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by,” is ...
In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and d...
Stare decisis, the rule that judicial precedents should be followed, has been considered by American...
Drastic changes in Supreme Court doctrine require citizens to reorder their affairs rapidly, undermi...
The Supreme Court of the United States has long embraced the doctrine of stare decisis as an appropr...
At the United States Supreme Court, what is old is new again. In a series of recent opinions,1 the j...
In this Article, I argue that the preclusive effect of precedent raises due-process concerns, and, o...
The Supreme Court follows the Doctrine of Stare Decisis, of which dictates that the Court must follo...
The doctrine of stare decisis remains a defining feature of American law despite challenges to its l...
In Kisor v. Wilkie, the Supreme Court recently confronted whether to overrule the doctrine under whi...
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This can generate a time-inconsiste...
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This might generate a time-inconsis...
'Stare Decisis' or 'stay with what has been decided' has long been understood as a fundamental prin...
Stare decisis has been called many things, among them a principle of policy, a series of prudential ...
When courts deliberate on the implications of a precedent case in the adjudication of a new dispute,...
Additional contributor: Timothy Johnson (faculty mentor).Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by,” is ...
In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and d...
Stare decisis, the rule that judicial precedents should be followed, has been considered by American...
Drastic changes in Supreme Court doctrine require citizens to reorder their affairs rapidly, undermi...
The Supreme Court of the United States has long embraced the doctrine of stare decisis as an appropr...
At the United States Supreme Court, what is old is new again. In a series of recent opinions,1 the j...
In this Article, I argue that the preclusive effect of precedent raises due-process concerns, and, o...
The Supreme Court follows the Doctrine of Stare Decisis, of which dictates that the Court must follo...
The doctrine of stare decisis remains a defining feature of American law despite challenges to its l...
In Kisor v. Wilkie, the Supreme Court recently confronted whether to overrule the doctrine under whi...