Belief revision and belief update are two different forms of belief change, and they serve different purposes. In this paper we focus on belief update, the formalization of change in beliefs due to changes in the world. The complexity of the basic update (introduced by Winslett [1990]) has been proved by Eiter and Gottlob (1991). Since then, many other formalizations have been proposed to overcome the limitations and drawbacks of Winslett's update. In this paper we analyze the complexity of the proposals presented in the literature, and relate some of them to previous work on closed world reasoning
AbstractThis paper presents a general, consistency-based framework for expressing belief change. The...
In this article we will introduce certain considerations that must be taken into account while imple...
Belief revision leads to temporal nonmonotonicity, i.e., the set of beliefs does not grow monotonica...
Belief revision and belief update are two different forms of belief change, and they serve different...
AbstractBelief revision and belief update are two different forms of belief change, and they serve d...
AbstractOne of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability t...
One of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability to cope w...
International audienceIterated belief change aims to determine how the belief state of a rational ag...
AbstractThe Katsuno and Mendelzon (KM) theory of belief update has been proposed as a reasonable mod...
gabriele.kern-isbernercs.uni-dortmund.de Abstract. This paper makes a foundational contribution to t...
This chapter gives an overview of current dynamic logics that describe belief update and revision, b...
If a new piece of information contradicts our previously held beliefs, we have to revise our beliefs...
It is widely acknowledged that belief revision and belief update are two very different types of pro...
In the companion paper (Towards a "sophisticated" model of belief dynamics. Part 7), a general frame...
Belief revision is the process of rearranging a knowledge base to preserve global consistency whilst...
AbstractThis paper presents a general, consistency-based framework for expressing belief change. The...
In this article we will introduce certain considerations that must be taken into account while imple...
Belief revision leads to temporal nonmonotonicity, i.e., the set of beliefs does not grow monotonica...
Belief revision and belief update are two different forms of belief change, and they serve different...
AbstractBelief revision and belief update are two different forms of belief change, and they serve d...
AbstractOne of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability t...
One of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability to cope w...
International audienceIterated belief change aims to determine how the belief state of a rational ag...
AbstractThe Katsuno and Mendelzon (KM) theory of belief update has been proposed as a reasonable mod...
gabriele.kern-isbernercs.uni-dortmund.de Abstract. This paper makes a foundational contribution to t...
This chapter gives an overview of current dynamic logics that describe belief update and revision, b...
If a new piece of information contradicts our previously held beliefs, we have to revise our beliefs...
It is widely acknowledged that belief revision and belief update are two very different types of pro...
In the companion paper (Towards a "sophisticated" model of belief dynamics. Part 7), a general frame...
Belief revision is the process of rearranging a knowledge base to preserve global consistency whilst...
AbstractThis paper presents a general, consistency-based framework for expressing belief change. The...
In this article we will introduce certain considerations that must be taken into account while imple...
Belief revision leads to temporal nonmonotonicity, i.e., the set of beliefs does not grow monotonica...