In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found the Data Retention Directive1 to be in breach of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter).2 This article examines the impact of the ruling in Digital Rights Ireland across the EU and considers how the Irish legislature should respond to this decision in a manner that maintains the appropriate balance between the investigatory aims of the government and the protection of fundamental rights
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
The short articles analyzes the key features of a dozen of recent EU Court of Justice decisions rend...
The internet and smartphones are symbols of our times. They define the self-perception of this gener...
In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the...
In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which...
Directive 2006/24/EC sets out data retention rules and is a useful tool for the investigation, detec...
The chapter explores the fate of the Data Retention Directive, the Digital Rights Ireland case and i...
The CJEU declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid by judgment of 8 April 2014. According ...
Recent technological developments have brought into question the protection of personal data and ind...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...
The growth of data retention in Europe has been marked by an interplay between national laws and Eur...
On July, 19, Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe gave his Opinion in the Tele2 case. The CJEU is aske...
This paper examines the challenges facing the EU regarding data retention, particularly in the after...
International audienceIn less than eighteen months, the Court of Justice of the European Union has d...
Metadata retention based on the modern technology capabilities is proven to be an effective tool for...
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
The short articles analyzes the key features of a dozen of recent EU Court of Justice decisions rend...
The internet and smartphones are symbols of our times. They define the self-perception of this gener...
In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the...
In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which...
Directive 2006/24/EC sets out data retention rules and is a useful tool for the investigation, detec...
The chapter explores the fate of the Data Retention Directive, the Digital Rights Ireland case and i...
The CJEU declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid by judgment of 8 April 2014. According ...
Recent technological developments have brought into question the protection of personal data and ind...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...
The growth of data retention in Europe has been marked by an interplay between national laws and Eur...
On July, 19, Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe gave his Opinion in the Tele2 case. The CJEU is aske...
This paper examines the challenges facing the EU regarding data retention, particularly in the after...
International audienceIn less than eighteen months, the Court of Justice of the European Union has d...
Metadata retention based on the modern technology capabilities is proven to be an effective tool for...
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
The short articles analyzes the key features of a dozen of recent EU Court of Justice decisions rend...
The internet and smartphones are symbols of our times. They define the self-perception of this gener...
Add to ORKG