Ranking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments in an abstract argumentation framework, by providing a ranking on arguments. This paper aims at going towards a generalization of the construction of such semantics, by investigating subsumption and incompatibility cases that may arise when principles that may enter into their composition are combined
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation provide a criterion to determine whether a set o...
International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments ...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A w...
This paper proposes a novel family of argumentation-based logics for handling inconsistency. Startin...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
International audienceExtension-based semantics evaluate the acceptability of sets of arguments, whi...
The paper develops a formal theory of the degree of justification of arguments, which relies solely ...
An abstract argumentation framework [15] consists of a direct graph where nodes represent arguments ...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation provide a criterion to determine whether a set o...
International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments ...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A w...
This paper proposes a novel family of argumentation-based logics for handling inconsistency. Startin...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
International audienceExtension-based semantics evaluate the acceptability of sets of arguments, whi...
The paper develops a formal theory of the degree of justification of arguments, which relies solely ...
An abstract argumentation framework [15] consists of a direct graph where nodes represent arguments ...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation provide a criterion to determine whether a set o...