Introduction: For decades, allocation of research funds worldwide has relied on an assessment of research proposals by referees’ reports and funding committees, a process known as peer review. A seemingly lack of alternative approaches to making decisions to fund research leaves peer review as the de facto system to fund allocation. Peer review is at the heart of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) goal of increasing efficiency in research from application to contract to final dissemination. This study focuses on the potential to inject flexibility into the now traditional peer review process. It will identify the elements of peer review and/or alternative approaches to funding allocation which supports the decision-making pr...
1. Peer review ensures that scientific findings and research funding proposals are subjected to inde...
BACKGROUND: Participatory Research (PR) entails the co-governance of research by academic researcher...
Peer review is not always the best methodology for research funding processes, and diverse strategie...
Introduction: allocation of research funds relies on peer review to support funding decisions, and t...
Objective:Health research funding organisations are responsible for allocating funds for research in...
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated >95% of academic medical research funding, so i...
Introduction: The allocation of grant funding often involves numerous review processes and points o...
INTRODUCTION Peer review of grant applications is employed routinely by health research funding bodi...
ObjectiveTo investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality peer review of ...
Objectives Innovations resulting from research have both national and global impact, so selecting th...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>To investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality ...
Innovations in decision-making practice for allocation of funds in health research are emerging; how...
To investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality peer review of research ...
The thesis presents a reformative criticism of science funding by peer review. The criticism is bas...
It is well known that peer review has limitations and may be biased. However, funding bodies rely on...
1. Peer review ensures that scientific findings and research funding proposals are subjected to inde...
BACKGROUND: Participatory Research (PR) entails the co-governance of research by academic researcher...
Peer review is not always the best methodology for research funding processes, and diverse strategie...
Introduction: allocation of research funds relies on peer review to support funding decisions, and t...
Objective:Health research funding organisations are responsible for allocating funds for research in...
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated >95% of academic medical research funding, so i...
Introduction: The allocation of grant funding often involves numerous review processes and points o...
INTRODUCTION Peer review of grant applications is employed routinely by health research funding bodi...
ObjectiveTo investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality peer review of ...
Objectives Innovations resulting from research have both national and global impact, so selecting th...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>To investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality ...
Innovations in decision-making practice for allocation of funds in health research are emerging; how...
To investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality peer review of research ...
The thesis presents a reformative criticism of science funding by peer review. The criticism is bas...
It is well known that peer review has limitations and may be biased. However, funding bodies rely on...
1. Peer review ensures that scientific findings and research funding proposals are subjected to inde...
BACKGROUND: Participatory Research (PR) entails the co-governance of research by academic researcher...
Peer review is not always the best methodology for research funding processes, and diverse strategie...