Add to ORKGQuestions whether the focus on freedom of expression under the Defamation Act 2013 could undermine the value of corporate reputation as a commercial asset
There are three distinct groups who might want to engage in speech about commercial entities or to c...
Reputational interests are protected against defamatory and injurious statements by the common law o...
When comparing the seminal Supreme Court of Canada defamation decisions of the 1990s and 2000s, it i...
This article, firstly, contextualises corporate reputation as a valuable commercial asset; secondly,...
The right to reputation and right to the freedom of speech are two essential elements that play the ...
The purpose of the law of defamation is the protection of reputation. While exhaustive accounts have...
In Australia, pursuant to Section 9 of the Defamation Act 2005, companies trading for profit with te...
The Defamation Act 2013 came into force on January 1, 2014. According to the Libel Reform Campaign, ...
This paper presents the results of a systematic analysis of all judgments handed down by the High Co...
The use of defamation law to protect corporate reputation is controversial. Australia, Canada and En...
Five years down the line from the Defamation Act 2013 coming into force, its effect on freedom of sp...
Corporations have increasingly used defamation suits as an offensive weapon. Many of these suits may...
April 2013, the Defamation Act was passed, the culmination of a four-year political campaign. The le...
This paper is an invited response to Deven Desai’s excellent article, Speech, Citizenry, and the Mar...
It is considered axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation. This proposition—commonsensical,...
There are three distinct groups who might want to engage in speech about commercial entities or to c...
Reputational interests are protected against defamatory and injurious statements by the common law o...
When comparing the seminal Supreme Court of Canada defamation decisions of the 1990s and 2000s, it i...
This article, firstly, contextualises corporate reputation as a valuable commercial asset; secondly,...
The right to reputation and right to the freedom of speech are two essential elements that play the ...
The purpose of the law of defamation is the protection of reputation. While exhaustive accounts have...
In Australia, pursuant to Section 9 of the Defamation Act 2005, companies trading for profit with te...
The Defamation Act 2013 came into force on January 1, 2014. According to the Libel Reform Campaign, ...
This paper presents the results of a systematic analysis of all judgments handed down by the High Co...
The use of defamation law to protect corporate reputation is controversial. Australia, Canada and En...
Five years down the line from the Defamation Act 2013 coming into force, its effect on freedom of sp...
Corporations have increasingly used defamation suits as an offensive weapon. Many of these suits may...
April 2013, the Defamation Act was passed, the culmination of a four-year political campaign. The le...
This paper is an invited response to Deven Desai’s excellent article, Speech, Citizenry, and the Mar...
It is considered axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation. This proposition—commonsensical,...
There are three distinct groups who might want to engage in speech about commercial entities or to c...
Reputational interests are protected against defamatory and injurious statements by the common law o...
When comparing the seminal Supreme Court of Canada defamation decisions of the 1990s and 2000s, it i...