Add to ORKGFrom the Ground Up piece on a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing the city of New London, Conn., to take homes and commercial properties through eminent domain for general economic development. The decision may have implications for public/private partnerships created to redevelop distressed areas. In Maine, the use of eminent domain for economic development is only allowed to eliminate blighted areas, and a statute requires owner consent for economic development-related takings in blighted areas
Eminent domain has been a hot topic in legal circles since the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s opinion in Ke...
The controversial Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. The City of New London, allowed a local government...
A little more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in Kelo v. City of New London u...
Cities lacking the ability to prosper economically ultimately begin to deteriorate, which leaves a s...
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
Published just weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court handed down their controversial decision on Kelo ...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
Owning property, starting a business, and owning your own home are things considered to be part of t...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...
The Court\u27s decision last term in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S.Ct. 2655 (2005), has drawn he...
Contrary to last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling Kelo v. City of New London, using eminent domain t...
This paper investigates changes of interpretations about the taking clause and public use based on t...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
In Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of eminent domain for econo...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...
Eminent domain has been a hot topic in legal circles since the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s opinion in Ke...
The controversial Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. The City of New London, allowed a local government...
A little more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in Kelo v. City of New London u...
Cities lacking the ability to prosper economically ultimately begin to deteriorate, which leaves a s...
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
Published just weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court handed down their controversial decision on Kelo ...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
Owning property, starting a business, and owning your own home are things considered to be part of t...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...
The Court\u27s decision last term in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S.Ct. 2655 (2005), has drawn he...
Contrary to last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling Kelo v. City of New London, using eminent domain t...
This paper investigates changes of interpretations about the taking clause and public use based on t...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
In Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of eminent domain for econo...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...
Eminent domain has been a hot topic in legal circles since the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s opinion in Ke...
The controversial Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. The City of New London, allowed a local government...
A little more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in Kelo v. City of New London u...