On January 8, 1974, the Nova Scotia Amusements Regulation Board banned the showing of the film Last Tango in Paris. Gerard McNeil, the editor of a Dartmouth newspaper, decided to challenge the powers of the Board to make such prohibitions. He first appealed to the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, as required by section 3(4) of the Theatres and Amusements Act\u27 but he was not recognized by that body as having the right to appeal. He then requested the Attorney-General to refer the constitutionality of the Act to the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, but to no avail. Early in 1974 Mr. McNeil applied to the Trial Division of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court for a declaration that the Board was exercising unconstitutional power...
A distinctive cluster of appeals has made its way to the Supreme Court of Canada in the last year or...
The editor and publisher of the Miami Herald published two editorials and a cartoon which inaccurate...
Part I of this article looks at the history of the federal courts\u27 jurisprudence in deciding pris...
On January 8, 1974, the Nova Scotia Amusements Regulation Board banned the showing of the film Last ...
The New York Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a license to exhibit the French motion picture L...
Four years ago an eminent Canadian jurist denounced the presence of a CBC television crew filming tr...
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Patriation Reference was a landmark in the jurisprudential analy...
The distributor of the motion picture Lady Chatterley\u27s Lover applied to the Motion Picture Div...
In the companion cases of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Lessard and Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. ...
Over the years, mass media has played a significant role in modern culture that reaches a large audi...
From 1957 to 1973, the United States Supreme Court was in the process of articulating and refining t...
Following a Supreme Court decision in 1992, the regulation of obscenity in Canada was justified on t...
Canadian courts are in the process of challenging existing thought about the constitutional protecti...
A limited form of judicial review has always been a prominent feature of Canadian federalism. Immedi...
In this study of the Federal Government\u27s control of obscenity through criminal sanctions and its...
A distinctive cluster of appeals has made its way to the Supreme Court of Canada in the last year or...
The editor and publisher of the Miami Herald published two editorials and a cartoon which inaccurate...
Part I of this article looks at the history of the federal courts\u27 jurisprudence in deciding pris...
On January 8, 1974, the Nova Scotia Amusements Regulation Board banned the showing of the film Last ...
The New York Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a license to exhibit the French motion picture L...
Four years ago an eminent Canadian jurist denounced the presence of a CBC television crew filming tr...
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Patriation Reference was a landmark in the jurisprudential analy...
The distributor of the motion picture Lady Chatterley\u27s Lover applied to the Motion Picture Div...
In the companion cases of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Lessard and Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. ...
Over the years, mass media has played a significant role in modern culture that reaches a large audi...
From 1957 to 1973, the United States Supreme Court was in the process of articulating and refining t...
Following a Supreme Court decision in 1992, the regulation of obscenity in Canada was justified on t...
Canadian courts are in the process of challenging existing thought about the constitutional protecti...
A limited form of judicial review has always been a prominent feature of Canadian federalism. Immedi...
In this study of the Federal Government\u27s control of obscenity through criminal sanctions and its...
A distinctive cluster of appeals has made its way to the Supreme Court of Canada in the last year or...
The editor and publisher of the Miami Herald published two editorials and a cartoon which inaccurate...
Part I of this article looks at the history of the federal courts\u27 jurisprudence in deciding pris...