In the opening section of this paper we spell out an account of our naive view of bodily sensations that is of historical and philosophical significance. This account of our shared view of bodily sensations captures common ground between Descartes, who endorses an error theory regarding our everyday thinking about bodily sensations, and Berkeley, who is more sympathetic with common sense. In the second part of the paper we develop an alternative to this account and discuss what is at stake in deciding between these two ways of understanding our everyday view. In the third and final part of the paper we offer an argument in favour of our alternative
Philosophers of perception have been readier to postulate the existence of a visual field than to ac...
In the last two decades there have been many critics of western biomedicine’s poor integration of so...
This writing elaborates on how the two Great Philosophers see reality, human and God existence. The ...
On the old story about early modern philosophy, Descartes is a “rationalist” who devalues the senses...
Descartes's lack of clarity about the causal connections between brain states and mental states has ...
In this volume the author presents a thoroughly considered critical and historical analysis of the t...
This paper discusses the epistemic status of bodily sensations—especially the sensations of pain, hu...
According to Berkeley, God’s activity explains human sensory perception. Berkeley draws heavily on D...
Despite his reputation for neglecting the body, Descartes develops a systematic account of bodily aw...
Sensory experience seems to be the basis of our knowledge and conception of mind-independent things....
Pleasures and pains play an important role for Berkeley, not just in motivating action, but also by ...
I have three aims in this paper. First, I show that in order to motivate skepticism about other min...
Although Descartes and Malebranche argue that we are immaterial thinking things, they also maintain ...
Patočka highlights the central role of Cartesianism in our tradition of thinking. Yet, today, brain ...
We enjoy immediate knowledge of our own limbs and bodies. I argue that this knowledge, which is also...
Philosophers of perception have been readier to postulate the existence of a visual field than to ac...
In the last two decades there have been many critics of western biomedicine’s poor integration of so...
This writing elaborates on how the two Great Philosophers see reality, human and God existence. The ...
On the old story about early modern philosophy, Descartes is a “rationalist” who devalues the senses...
Descartes's lack of clarity about the causal connections between brain states and mental states has ...
In this volume the author presents a thoroughly considered critical and historical analysis of the t...
This paper discusses the epistemic status of bodily sensations—especially the sensations of pain, hu...
According to Berkeley, God’s activity explains human sensory perception. Berkeley draws heavily on D...
Despite his reputation for neglecting the body, Descartes develops a systematic account of bodily aw...
Sensory experience seems to be the basis of our knowledge and conception of mind-independent things....
Pleasures and pains play an important role for Berkeley, not just in motivating action, but also by ...
I have three aims in this paper. First, I show that in order to motivate skepticism about other min...
Although Descartes and Malebranche argue that we are immaterial thinking things, they also maintain ...
Patočka highlights the central role of Cartesianism in our tradition of thinking. Yet, today, brain ...
We enjoy immediate knowledge of our own limbs and bodies. I argue that this knowledge, which is also...
Philosophers of perception have been readier to postulate the existence of a visual field than to ac...
In the last two decades there have been many critics of western biomedicine’s poor integration of so...
This writing elaborates on how the two Great Philosophers see reality, human and God existence. The ...